Present master’s thesis is divided into four substantive areas. The first one analyzes provisions of the Constitution arranging admissibility of interference to property, principle of economy and efficiency in terms of which the legislation of expropriation procedure is analyzed. In addition, Slovenian expropriation procedure is also explained so that reader can easily understand its content in the continuation. The second part presents good solutions of comparable procedures in perspective of economy and efficiency. These solutions are also compared with Slovenian expropriation procedure. Third, the most extensive part is the most important because it presents all important institutes of new expropriation procedure and analyzes them in perspective of principle of economy and efficiency. On the basis of this analysis the conclusion contains major institutes of the new procedure which enables speeding up expropriation procedure and evaluated hypothesis. The last part of master's thesis contains empirical part which unfortunately can’t confirm the hypothesis that expropriation procedure based on Spatial Planning Act (ZUreP-2) is faster than previous expropriation procedure. Due to the new legislation of expropriation procedure was adopted not long ago, the conclusion warns us that its effect will be noticeable after some time.
|
