izpis_h1_title_alt

Ocenjevanje trajnosti na primeru projektne dokumentacije doma za starejše : diplomska naloga
Primožič, Tim (Author), Dovjak, Mateja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, Božiček, David (Co-mentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,26 MB)

Abstract
Za ocenjevanje trajnosti stavbe se uporabljajo različne metode. V Sloveniji še ni nacionalne metode za certificiranje trajnosti stavb, stavbe v Sloveniji pa je možno ocenjevati po drugih metodah, kot so BREEAM, LEED, HQE, DGNB, WELL itd. Med seboj se razlikujejo po točkovanju, kategorijah in kriterijih. Namen diplomskega dela je raziskati pojem trajnosti ter se seznaniti z zakonodajo in metodami ocenjevanja trajnosti stavb. V drugem delu diplomske naloge smo opravili analizo možnosti ocenitve trajnosti stavbe na podlagi izdelane projektne dokumentacije (PGD) Doma za bivanje na Regentovi ulici v Ljubljani. Zanima nas, koliko informacij o trajnosti stavbe lahko pridobimo iz PGD-ja. Uporabili smo metodo, prilagojeno po Orodju za enostavno preverjanje trajnostnosti stavbe, ki je bilo razvito v doktorski disertaciji Jerneja Marklja. Pri celotni metodi je skupno zajetih 34 kriterijev v treh vidikih. To so okoljski, ekonomski in sociološki vidik. Iz analize vidimo, da je 21 kriterijev (58,8 %) omenjenih v PGD-ju, 11 kriterijev (35,3 %) ni zajetih, 2 kriterija (5,9 %) pa sta deloma omenjena v sklopu sociološkega vidika. Na podlagi relevantnih določil (zakoni, predpisi, standardi, tehnične smernice itd.) lahko skupno ocenimo 16 kriterijev (47,1 %), 18 kriterijev (52,9 %) pa ne moremo oceniti. Ugotovili smo, da na podlagi izdelane projektne dokumentacije (PGD) ne moremo v celoti preveriti vseh 34 kriterijev trajnosti stavbe. Potrebne bi bile izboljšave, da bi se že v fazo projektiranja vključile vse informacije, s katerimi bi preverili izpolnjevanje vseh kriterijev trajnosti.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Trajnost, trajnostna stavba, metode ocenjevanja trajnosti, orodje za enostavno preverjanje trajnosti, okoljski vidik, ekonomski vidik, sociološki vidik
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Tipology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Year:2019
Publisher:[T. Primožič]
UDC:725:77.018(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:8824417 Link is opened in a new window
Views:82
Downloads:35
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share: Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Assessment of sustainability on the example of project documentation for the home of elderly : graduation thesis
Abstract:
Different methods are used to assess the sustainability of a building. In Slovenia, there is no national method for certification of sustainability of buildings, but it is possible to evaluate buildings in Slovenia using other methods, such as BREEAM, LEED, HQE, DGNB, WELL, etc. They differ according to scoring, categories and criteria. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the notion of sustainability, to be familiar with the legislation and methods of assessing the sustainability of buildings. In the second part of the diploma thesis, we analyzed the possibility of assessing the sustainability of the building (Residence Home on Regent Street in Ljubljana) on the basis of the project documentation (PGD). We are interested in how much information about the sustainability of the building can be obtained from the documentation (PGD). For this part, we used a method, adapted on the basis of the Simple tool for building sustainability evaluation from the doctoral dissertation of Jernej Markelj. The method is total of 34 criteria in three aspects. These are environmental, economic and sociological aspect. From the analysis, we see that 20 criteria (61,8 %) are mentioned in the PGD, 12 criteria (32,3 %) are not mentioned, and 2 criteria (5,9 %) are partly mentioned. Based on the relevant provisions, we can collectively evaluate 16 criteria (47,1 %) and we can not evaluate 18 criteria (52,9 %). We have found, that based on the project documentation (PGD), we can not completely check all 34 criteria of sustainability of the building. Improvemens will be needed to include all information in the design phase, in order to verify that all sustainability criteria are met.

Keywords:Sustainability, sustainable building, sustainability assessment methods, simple tool for building sustainability evaluation, environmental indicator, economic indicator, sociological indicator

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back