izpis_h1_title_alt

Hišna preiskava
ID Korošec, Sabina (Author), ID Gorkič, Primož (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Hafner, Miha (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (743,16 KB)
MD5: C00A65C58CCA59442438ACE0DE8E582C

Abstract
V magistrskem diplomskem delu je obravnavano preiskovalno dejanje hišne preiskave, s poudarkom na preiskavah odvetniških pisarn. Najprej je nekaj besed namenjenih splošni zasebnosti ter pregledu mednarodne in nacionalne pravne podlage. Odvetniki so v evropskih nacionalnih zakonodajah različno obravnavani, a vsem ureditvam je skupno, da zaščito zagotavljajo. Ker v Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah ni nobenih določb, ki bi to področje posebej urejale, je pomembno delovanje Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, ki skrbi za njeno razlago, na katero se večkrat tudi sama sklicujem. Sledi obravnava posebnega položaja odvetnikov, ki izhaja iz zaupnega razmerja med njimi in strankami. Samo če bo stranka odvetniku zaupala, bo odvetnik lahko zagotovil učinkovito obrambo. Zaradi posebnega položaja splošni pogoji za hišno preiskavo ne zadoščajo, zato poleg splošnih potrebujemo še posebne. Ker teh slovenska ureditev ne zagotavlja v zadostni meri, je Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije z odločbo U-I-115/14, Up-218/14 ugotovilo številne kršitve človekovih pravic odvetnikov, pri katerih so bile opravljene preiskave, in da sta Zakon o kazenskem postopku in Zakon o odvetništvu neskladna z Ustavo Republike Slovenije. V zadnjem delu je obravnavana nova ureditev, ki prinaša pomemben korak naprej glede varstva strank, ki si poiščejo pravno pomoč pri odvetnikih. Gre za prehodno ureditev, določeno s strani Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije, ki velja dokler zakonodajalec neustavnosti ne odpravi, in novelo Zakona o kazenskem postopku, ki je bila sprejeta 26. marca 2019 (veljavnost: 15 dni po objavi, uporaba: 6 mesecev po uveljavitvi).

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:nedotakljivost stanovanja, hišna preiskava, preiskava odvetniške pisarne, zaupno razmerje, pravica do zasebnosti, odvetniška zasebnost, Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, ZKP-N
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-107749 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:16797265 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:22.05.2019
Views:21800
Downloads:792
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Search of a house
Abstract:
The master thesis deals with the investigative act of the search of a house, with an emphasis on the searches of law firms. First of all, a few words are dedicated to general privacy and the review of the international and national legal basis. Attorneys are treated differently in European national laws, but providing protection is common to all regulations. Since there are no provisions in the European Convention on Human Rights that specifically regulate this field, it is important that the European Court of Human Rights deals with its interpretation, which I refer to myself on several occasions. The following discussion presents the special position of attorneys arising from the confidential relationship between them and the parties. Only if the client entrusts the attorney, will the attorney be able to provide effective defense. Due to the special situation, the general conditions for the searching a house are not sufficient, so we need special conditions in addition to the general ones. Since the Slovene regulations do not provide sufficient protection, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, in decision U-I-115/14, Up-218/14, found numerous violations of the human rights of attorneys who were investigated and that the Criminal Procedure Act and the Attorneys Act are inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. The final part deals with a new arrangement, which brings an important step forward in the protection of clients who seek legal assistance from attorneys. This is a transitional arrangement established by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, which is in force until the legislature eliminate the unconstitutional regulation, and the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act, which was adopted on 26th March 2019 (validity: 15 days after publication, use: 6 months after entry into force).

Keywords:inviolability of housing, search of a house, search of an attorney's office, relationship of trust, right to privacy, attorney's privacy, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, European Court of Human Rights, ZKP-N

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back