Katalogizacijske napake v COBIB-u z vidika katalogizatorjev in uporabnikov

Mrđenović, Branka (author), Petek, Marija (mentor)

Kakovost bibliografskih zapisov je zelo pomembna, saj uporabnikom omogoča, da v katalogu najdejo gradivo, ki ga iščejo. Skozi ekspertno analizo vzorca 100 zapisov iz COBIB-a, anketo uporabnikov glede uporabe COBISS/OPAC-a in COBISS+ ter intervjujev s katalogizatorji in uporabniki glede napak v knjižničnih katalogih smo dobili vpogled v stanje kakovosti knjižničnih katalogov v COBIB-u. Posebej zanimivo je mnenje uporabnikov in katalogizatorjev v povezavi z napakami v knjižničnih katalogih. V raziskavi smo ugotovili 122 napak. Uporabniki napak, ki smo jim jih pokazali, večinoma niso našli, so pa poudarili, da bi jih le-te motile, če bi se pojavile v naslovu ali pri avtorjih. Katalogizatorji so bili s kakovostjo zapisov v COBIB-u večinoma zadovoljni, so pa poudarili, da bi bila za doseganje višje kakovosti v knjižničnih katalogih potrebna centralizacija katalogizacije. Za izboljšanje stanja predlagamo več izobraževanj in seminarjev za katalogizatorje. Z raziskavo smo pridobili nov vpogled na napake s strani katalogizatorjev in uporabnikov, to pa lahko pripomore k boljšemu razumevanju napak v katalogu in izboljšanju kakovosti.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: katalogizacija, katalogizacijske napake, katalogizacijska pravila, katalogizacijski pravilniki, kakovost, COMARC, ISBD, uporabniki knjižnic, katalogizatorji, bolonjske magistrske naloge
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
• Organization: FF - Faculty of Arts
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: [B. Mrđenović]
• Year: 2018
• Number of pages: 110 f.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-107656
• UDC: 025.3(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 67833954
• Publication date in RUL: 10.05.2019

Secondary language

• Language: English

Abstract

Quality of bibliografic records is important, because it helps users to find books they want. We conducted expert analisis of 100 records form COBIB, survey of users about their use of COBISS/OPAC and COBISS+ and interviews with cataloguers and users about errors in library catalogues. Opinion from users and cataloguers is very interesting. Results show that there were 122 errors. Users in general didn't find errors we showed them, but they said, errors would bother them if these errors were find in titles or authors. Cataloguers were generally satisfied with quality of records in COBIB, but they suggest centralization of cataloguing if we want higher quality of records. We also suggest more seminars and lectures for cataloguers. With this research we got new insight on cataloging errors with opinions of users and cataloguers. This can help to better understand errors and improve quality in catalogues.