izpis_h1_title_alt

Prenos funkcije preiskovanja na policijo in državnega tožilca
ID Recko, Špela (Author), ID Šugman Stubbs, Katja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,38 MB)
MD5: DB39096CD64E5FBFC25070AA8574CF83

Abstract
Magistrska naloga obravnava problematiko prenosa funkcije preiskovanja na policijo in državnega tožilca glede na obstoječi kazenski postopek v slovenskem pravnem redu. Predstavljeni so tako pozitivni kot negativni vidiki prenosa in možnosti prenosa funkcije preiskovanja glede na obstoječi kazenski postopek in posledično tudi vprašanje ali bi ukinitev funkcije preiskovalnega sodnika prinesla še večjo neenakost orožij med strankama in s tem večjo prevlado in premoč na strani državnega tožilca ter torej bila neprimerna. Na začetku magistrska naloga opiše prehod kazenskega postopka od inkvizitornega k adversarnemu ter analizira razvoj slovenskega kazenskega procesnega prava, v nadaljevanju pa je podrobneje predstavljen predhodni postopek. V okviru predhodnega postopka je podrobneje opisana preiskava kot značilni institut inkvizitornega postopka, ki so jo prevzeli vsi mešani kazenski postopki. V povezavi s tem magistrska naloga predstavi tudi hrvaško ureditev predhodnega kazenskega postopka in ga primerja s slovensko ureditvijo. Ob vsem navedenem pa magistrska naloga opisuje tudi vlogo glavnih akterjev kazenskega postopka - policije, državnega tožilca in preiskovalnega sodnika.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:preiskava, ukinitev preiskovalnega sodnika, organi postopka, tipi kazenskega postopka, kršitev načela enakosti orožij, Hrvaška
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-107418 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:16778833 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:12.04.2019
Views:2554
Downloads:279
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The transfer of the investigative function to the police and the public prosecutor
Abstract:
This thesis deals with the issue of transferring the investigative function to the police and the public prosecutor in relation to the existing criminal procedure of the Slovenian legal order. The thesis argues both positive and negative aspects of transferring and the possibility of transferring the investigative function in relation to the existing criminal procedure. Consequently, it also argues the question of whether cancelling the function of an investigating judge would result in an even greater inequality of arms between parties, as this would mean even greater dominance and superiority on the part of the public prosecutor, which would be inappropriate. In the first part, the thesis describes the transition from inquisitorial to adversarial criminal procedure and analyses the development of the Slovenian criminal procedure law. In the second part, the preliminary procedure is presented in more detail. As a part of the preliminary procedure, the thesis further describes investigation as the distinctive institute of the inquisitorial procedure, which has been taken on by all mixed criminal proceedings. In relation to this, the thesis also presents the Croatian system of the preliminary criminal procedure and compares it to the Slovenian system. Furthermore, this thesis also describes the role of the main actors of the criminal procedure – the police, the public prosecutor and the investigating judge.

Keywords:investigation, cancelling the role of the investigating judge, the procedure authorities, types of criminal procedure, violation of the principle of the equality of arms, Croatia

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back