Predstave osnovnošolcev o razvrščanju sesalcev

Marolt, Špela (author), Tomažič, Iztok (mentor)

V magistrskem delu smo raziskovali, ali učenci prepoznajo različne vrste sesalcev in pri katerih vrstah se pojavljajo težave pri poimenovanju in razvrščanju. S preizkusom znanja smo pri učencih od 6. do 9. razreda preverili njihovo znanje o sesalcih. Dobljene podatke smo analizirali s programom za statistično obdelavo podatkov (SPSS). Pri tem smo se osredotočili na pojav razlik med fanti in dekleti, med različno starimi učenci in tistimi, ki imajo oziroma nimajo stika z naravo. Rezultati so pokazali, da deklice bolje razvrščajo živali med sesalce kot dečki, učenci, ki živijo v mestu, bolje uvrščajo ježa med sesalce kot tisti, ki živijo na podeželju, in da učenci, ki hodijo v naravo, bolje uvrščajo ježa in medveda med sesalce kot tisti, ki narave ne obiskujejo. Pri odgovarjanju, ali so trditve v povezavi z vrstami sesalcev pravilne ali ne, se je pokazalo, da imajo največ znanja devetošolci, sedmošolci pa na trditve tudi dobro odgovarjajo v primerjavi z osmošolci in šestošolci, in da imajo več znanja v mestu živeči učenci kot tisti s podeželja, vendar so slednji odgovarjali bolje le na trditev: Rogovje muflona ali gamsa je zgrajeno iz kosti. Glede na to, ali učenci obiskujejo naravo ali ne, so se pomembne razlike pojavile le pri trditvi: Medved je izključno mesojeda žival. Učenci, ki naravo obiskujejo, so bili pri odgovorih bolj uspešni kot tisti, ki v naravo ne zahajajo. Pri prepoznavanju vrst iz slikovnega materiala pa so v vseh primerih učenci zelo dobro prepoznavali vse izbrane vrste sesalcev.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: učenci
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
• Organization: PEF - Faculty of Education
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-105514
• COBISS.SI-ID: 12223817
• Publication date in RUL: 10.12.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Elementary school students' conceptions about the classification of mammals

Abstract

We looked into with our part, if pupils recognized different kind of mammals and which kinds problems are occurring at naming and classification at. We checked their knowledge on mammals with the test of knowledge at pupils of 6th to 9th class. We analyzed got data with program for statistical data processing (SPSS). We concentrated on occurrence of differences among boys and girls at this, among differently old pupils and those, that have or that don’t have the contact with nature. We gained results like this: girls are recognizing mammals better as boys, pupils living in a town, are recognize mammals better as pupils living on a countryside and that pupils, that go as those, that don’t go to nature, are recognizing mammals better. At answering or claims are correct to mammals concerning kids, if it wasn’t showed next: pupils of 9th class have most knowledge, pupils 7th class are answering claims also well in comparison to pupils on 8th and pupils 6th class, and that pupils living in a town have more knowledge as pupils living on a countryside. Pupils were recognizing kind of mammals in all four given cases very well at recognizing of kinds from image material.

• Keywords: pupils