Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Človekove pravice v kontekstu globalne pravičnosti
ID
Turk, Miha
(
Author
),
ID
Pribac, Igor
(
Mentor
)
More about this mentor...
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,11 MB)
MD5: 36B50938C7B4FAE267AFAAB05C58A3A0
Image galllery
Abstract
V nalogi bom obravnaval problem interpretacije človekovih pravic v teoriji Johna Rawlsa in Thomasa Poggeja s posebnim ozirom na idealni in ne-idealni teoriji kot specifičnima načinoma obravnavanja normativne teorije. Osrednji del naloge bo predstavljala razdelava teoretskih temeljev Rawlsove knjige A Theory of Justice, njeni kontroverzni razširitvi v sfero mednarodnih odnosov in Poggejevi teoriji globalne pravičnosti. Zagovarjal bom, da je teoretični temelj Rawlsove teorije idealen, Poggejeva teorija pa je v temelju ne-idealna. Nadalje bo naloga zagovarjala, da omenjena distinkcija med avtorjema ustvari paradoks, ki je najbolj očiten v njuni zasnovi človekovih pravic, Rawlsova idealna zasnova namreč ustvari konzervativen okvir človekovih pravic (glede na status quo), Poggejeva idealna teorija pa ustvari koncepcijo, ki je morda preveč univerzalna.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
globalna pravičnost
,
človekove pravice
,
politična filozofija
,
ne-idealna teorija
,
Rawls
,
Pogge
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Organization:
FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:
2018
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-105198
Publication date in RUL:
08.11.2018
Views:
1161
Downloads:
245
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Human Rights in the Context of Global Justice
Abstract:
Thesis will address the issue of interpretation of human rights in the theory of John Rawls and Thomas Pogge. Aforementioned issue shall be addressed through the examination of ideal and non-ideal theory as specific modes of theoretical deliberation. The main body of the thesis will present the theoretical foundations of ideal and non-ideal theory in Rawls’s A Theory of Justice and its controversial implementation in the sphere of international relations as well as Pogges theory of global justice. I will argue that the theoretical foundation of Rawls is ideal while Pogges foundation is non-ideal. Furthermore the thesis will argue that distinction between the authors creates a paradox that is evident in their conception of human rights where Rawlss ideal conceptualization constructs a more conservative framework (in regards to the status quo of human rights) while Pogges non-ideal theory creates a concept that is perhaps too universal.
Keywords:
global justice
,
human rights
,
political philosophy
,
non-ideal theory
,
Rawls
,
Pogge
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back