VARSTVO PRAVIC V UPRAVNIH STVAREH PRED EVROPSKIM SODIŠČEM ZA ČLOVEKOVE PRAVICE

Rusl, Ana Marija (author), Kovač, Polonca (mentor)

Človekove pravice pripadajo vsem ljudem, ne glede na državljanstvo, spol, raso, vero, jezik ali kateri drug status, in so tiste pravice, ki varujejo določene dobrine, katere so nujno potrebne za delovanje posameznika v družbi. V primeru, da posameznik meni, da mu je bila s posameznim aktom kršena določena pravica, mu država omogoča pravno varstvo, ki je določeno z ustavo in zakonom, ter zagotavlja pravno ter zakonito odločanje, tudi v konkretnih upravnih zadevah. V diplomskem delu sem preučevala judikaturo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (ESČP), posebej v upravnih zadevah po nacionalnem pravu, pri čemer sem uporabila deskriptivno, primerjalno in statistično metodo. V raziskovalnem delu diplomskega dela se osredotočam predvsem na analizo letnih poročil ESČP v obdobju 2014–2017, tj. obseg pritožb pred ESČP, in sicer, ali se to število letno povečuje, pada ali stagnira. Analizo sem razdelila na dve poglavji, in sicer na analizo vseh in le upravnih zadev. Skozi raziskavo sem prišla do ugotovitev, da se v celoti največ kršitev nanaša na 6. člen Konvencije, tj. pravice do poštenega sojenja, zaradi predolgotrajnih postopkov oziroma pravice do odločanja v razumnem roku. Tudi Slovenija je prepogosto kršila pravico do sojenja v razumnem roku. ESČP je v sodbi Lukenda opozorilo, da ta kršitev predstavlja sistemski problem države. Šele po izreku te sodbe se je Slovenija začela zavedati pomembnosti spoštovanja pravice do sojenja v razumnem roku.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: človekove pravice, varstvo pravic, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, letna poročila, upravne zadeve, upravni postopek, odločanje v razumnem roku
• Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper
• Organization: FU - Faculty of Administration
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-103807
• Publication date in RUL: 26.09.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Abstract

Human rights and freedoms belong to every person in the word regardless of their nationality, gender, race, religion, language or any other status. Individuals who believe their human rights have been violated and are unable to remedy their claim through their national legal system, may lodge an application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The alleged violation must have been committed by one of the States bound by the Convention. I have studied especially administrative matters according to the national law in front of the ECtHR. The methods used in my diploma are descriptive, statistics, and comparison. In The research part, I mainly focus on the analysis of the annual reports of the ECtHR, between 2014–2017, to clarify, if the number of complaints before the ECtHR is increasing, falling or stagnating. In administrative matters, the most common violation is lengthy decision- making. Slovenia also often violated the right to a trial within a reasonable time. In the Lukenda judgment, the ECHR noted, that this violation constituted a systemic problem of the state. After this judgments Slovenia began to be aware of the importance of respecting the right to a trial within a reasonable time.

• Keywords: human rights, protection of rights, European Court of Human Rights, administrative matters, administrative procedure, reasonable deadlines