Učinki spremembe materialnega predpisa na odločanje v upravnem postopku

Štemberger, Katja (author), Pirnat, Rajko (mentor), Žuber, Bruna (comentor)

Vprašanje uporabe ustreznega materialnega predpisa s časovnega vidika se zastavlja v povezavi z odločanjem upravnih organov v upravnem postopku, tako na prvi kot tudi na drugi stopnji. Zaradi vezanosti na načelo zakonitosti morajo organi pri odločanju o pravicah, obveznostih ali pravnih koristi strank uporabljati veljavne predpise, kar na podlagi interpretacije določila prvega odstavka 6. člena Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku sprejete v upravni teoriji in praksi praviloma pomeni predpise, ki veljajo ob izdaji prvostopenjske odločbe. Še vedno pa ostaja sporno vprašanje, ali to načelo veže upravne organe tudi v primeru ponovnega odločanja, če je bila prvostopenjska odločba v pritožbenem postopku zaradi materialnih ali formalnih kršitev odpravljena, v vmesnem času (po izdaji prvostopenjske odločbe) pa se je predpis, ki je bil podlaga za prvostopenjsko odločitev, spremenil. To vprašanje se ne zastavi, v kolikor ga novi predpis v prehodnih določbah že sam razreši. Ker pa zakonodajalec tega pogosto ne uredi, imajo upravni organi zaradi neenotne upravne in sodne prakse pri ponovnem odločanju velikokrat težavo, saj ne vedo, po katerem predpisu morajo odločati. Magistrsko delo analizira učinke spremembe materialnega predpisa na odločanje v upravnem postopku. V njem so predstavljeni argumenti, ki govorijo v prid stališču, da je potrebno pri ponovnem odločanju uporabiti spremenjeni predpis in argumenti, ki govorijo proti temu stališču, analizirana pa bodo tudi nekatera druga vprašanja, ki se v upravni praksi pojavljajo v zvezi s spremembami predpisov. Na koncu bo avtorica glede vprašanj, povezanih z uporabo materialnega prava s časovnega vidika, zavzela svoje mnenje in predlagala ureditev de lege ferenda.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: sprememba materialnega predpisa, odločanje v upravnem postopku, odprava upravne odločbe, ponovno odločanje, načelo zakonitosti.
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-102428
• COBISS.SI-ID: 16348753
• Publication date in RUL: 30.08.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: The effects of substantial provision's change on the decision-making process in the administrative procedure

Abstract

When administrative authorities are deciding in the administrative procedure on the first as well as on the second instance, they are often facing the question of which adequate substantial provision to apply. Bounded to the principle of legality, the administrative authorities have to use the provisions in force when deciding on the rights, obligations and legal interests of the parties; according to the interpretation of Article 6(1) of the Slovenian Administrative Procedure Act, set by the administrative theory and practice, this means that the authorities must use the provisions which are in force when a first-instance decision is issued. However, it still remains disputed whether the administrative authorities are also bounded to the principle of legality when reconsidering the same matter in cases where the first-instance decision had been annulled in the appeal proceedings due to the substantial or procedural violations, while the substantial provision applied when accepting the first-instance decision has changed in the meantime. This does not raise an issue when it is already clarified within the new provisions. Nevertheless, since the legislator does often not resolve this question when adopting new substantial provisions, the administrative authorities usually face a big problem when reconsidering the remitted decision; due to the non-uniform administrative and judicial case-law, it is not clear to them, which provision to apply. The present master thesis will analyse how the changed of substantial provisions affect the decision-making in the administrative procedure. The author will introduce arguments, which speak in favour of the view that a new provision has to be used when reconsidering the decision, and also the arguments which speak against this point of view. Some other questions, which are raised in the administrative practice with regard to the provision alternation, will also be presented. At the end, the author will adopt her own position and present a regulation de lege ferenda regarding the application of the substantial law from the temporal view.

• Keywords: change of the substantial provision, decision-making in the administrative procedure, annulment of the administrative decision, reconsideration of the referred decision, principle of legality.