izpis_h1_title_alt

Silobran v teoriji in sodni praksi
ID Kenda, Anja (Author), ID Jakulin, Vid (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (825,17 KB)
MD5: 70A3AA6EE392E94109FD9887492B1600

Abstract
Silobran je eden najstarejših institutov, ki izključuje kaznivost dejanja. V vseh pravnih sistemih je njegova ureditev precej podobna. O možnosti, da je podan silobran, se začnemo spraševati v primeru, da je šlo za obrambo zoper napad. Če so izpolnjeni tudi ostali pogoji, je v slovenskem pravnem sistemu izključena protipravnost takšnega ravnanja. Pogoji za silobran so podani že v zakonodaji, dodatno pa so se razvili v kazenskopravni teoriji in dogmatiki ter skozi sodno prakso. Kljub temu, da na prvi pogled izgleda, da je institut zakonodajno in teoretično natančno in popolno izdelan, v praksi še vseeno povzroča precej težav. Predvsem je to izraženo pri presojanju, ali je bila obramba nujna, kjer se kot dopolnilo uporablja načelo oz. pogoj sorazmernosti. Zaradi odprte in nedoločne narave pogoja le to pripelje do različnih odločitev v istih primerih. Dovoljena obramba se z razvojem družbe in pravnega sistema na različne načine vse bolj omejuje, kar je v določenih primerih vsekakor upravičeno. Kljub temu je pomembno, da se v takšnih občutljivih situacijah, kot so primeri silobrana, natančno opredeli in napolni zakonske predpostavke in na ta način pomaga sodiščem pri odločanju in zagotavljanju enotnosti, smiselnosti in pravičnosti sojenja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Silobran, napad, obramba, prekoračeni silobran, protipravnost, teorija, sodna praksa, kazensko pravo
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-100939 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:16117329 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.04.2018
Views:3214
Downloads:2354
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Self-defense in theory and legal practice
Abstract:
Self-defense is one of the oldest legal institutions, which rules out the criminality of action. In all legal systems, the regulation of self-defense is largely similar. In situations where one defends oneself from assault, we have to consider if this act was executed under conditions for self-defense. In case all the legal requirements are met, Slovenian legal system excludes illegality of such actions. Conditions required for self-defense are laid down by the law and are furthermore developed in legal theory, dogmatics and through legal practice. Even though prima facie makes the construction of self-defense look like it is complete, precise and well defined, significant problems are still experienced in practice. Primarily this can be seen while assessing whether or not the defense was necessary, where as an additional condition principle of proportionality is being applied. Due to the open and indefinite nature of proportionality condition, different judges may reach disparate conclusions on the same case. Permitted defense, is with the development of society and legal systems, more and more limited, which in some cases it can certainly be justified. It is, however, important that, in delicate cases such as that of self-defense, legal assumptions are precise, full and well defined. In such a way, it assures clear directions to the court in proceedings and ensures the uniformity and fairness of the trial.

Keywords:Self-defense, assault, defense, excessive self-defense, unlawfulness, theory, legal practice, criminal law

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back