izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava različnih metod določitve položaja pri katastrski izmeri : diplomska naloga
ID Novak, Marko (Author), ID Pavlovčič Prešeren, Polona (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Lisec, Anka (Co-mentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,29 MB)
MD5: 5711C255F694B7FBB800C107FAAD39C1
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/3ddb71eb-2040-41e5-a4f0-304361ecc9e7

Abstract
Danes je v nalogah zemljiškega katastra uporaba tehnologije GNSS za določitev položajev točk nujno potrebna. V primernih pogojih za izvedbo izmere GNSS lahko položaje točk določamo neposredno z različnimi geodetskimi metodami izmere GNSS. V primerih nezmožnosti sprejema signalov s satelitov GNSS zaradi ovir na primernih mestih z GNSS vzpostavimo točke, preko katerih s klasičnimi metodami geodetske izmere določimo položaj v referenčnem koordinatnem sistemu. V diplomski nalogi smo se osredotočili na praktično uporabo različnih metod izmere GNSS pri določitvi koordinat zemljiškokatastrskih točk dveh urejenih parcel. Primerjali smo koordinate, ki so bile dobljene z različnimi metodami izmere GNSS ter kombinacijo GNSS in klasične izmere. Pri primerjavi koordinat smo za referenčne privzeli koordinate, pridobljene z obdelavo opazovanj statične izmere GNSS. Glede na te smo določali kakovost določitve koordinat z ostalimi metodami. Nadalje smo različno pridobljene koordinate uporabili za izračun površin zemljišč in ocenjevali vpliv kakovosti koordinat na izračunano površino zemljišča. Ugotovili smo, da je trikratna ponovna določitev koordinat z metodo RTK nujno potrebna, saj se v enkratni določitvi lahko zgodi, da je položaj točke zaradi vplivov na opazovanja določen nepravilno, kar nadalje vpliva na nepravilno določitev površine zemljišča. V nalogi smo ugotovili, da nepravilna določitev koordinate ene točke velikosti nekaj dm privede do napake v izračunu obravnavane površine zemljišča v vrednosti 14 m2, kar znaša 0,18% celotne površine parcele.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:geodezija, diplomska naloga, UNI, GIG, zemljiški kataster, tehnologija GNSS, klasične geodetske metode, parcela, metode izmere GNSS, površina zemljišča
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Novak]
Year:2016
Number of pages:XII, 34 str., [2] str. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-86466 This link opens in a new window
UDC:528.44(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:7843425 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:09.12.2016
Views:2978
Downloads:640
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of different positioning methods at cadastral survey
Abstract:
Nowadays in the functions of a land cadastre, the use of GNSS technology in determining point positions is absolutely essential. In appropriate conditions for carrying out a GNSS survey, the positions of the points can be directly determined using various surveying methods of the GNSS survey. In situations where the signals from the GNSS satellites cannot be received due to obstacles, we can set up reference points using the GNSS, than we can use conventional surveying methods for determination of the positions in the reference coordinate system. Our thesis focuses on the practical use of the various GNSS surveying methods when trying to determine the coordinates of land cadastre points of two land plots with determined boundaries. We compared the coordinates obtained with different GNSS methods and with a combination of GNSS and conventional surveys. For the comparison, we used the coordinates obtained through processing observations of the static GNSS surveys as reference. Based on these, we established the quality of coordinate determining with other methods. Furthermore, we used the differently obtained coordinates to calculate the surface area and evaluated the impact of the coordinate quality on the calculated surface area. We found out, that it is essential to repeat the RTK measurements three times, because if done only once, the position of the points can be determined falsely due to external influences on the observation. In turn, that can also result in an incorrectly calculated surface area. Our thesis identified that, in determining the coordinates, a mistakes of just a few decimetres can lead to a far bigger mistake of 14m2 (0,18%) in the surface area calculations.

Keywords:geodesy, lend cadastre, GNSS technology, conventional surveying methods, land plot, GNSS surveying methods, surface area

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back