Analiza nekaterih dejavnikov uspešnosti sojenja košarkarskih sodnikov različnih sodniških list v Sloveniji : magistrsko delo

Šen, Matic (author), Erčulj, Frane (mentor)

Namen magistrske naloge je primerjati, iskati razlike in podobnosti med košarkarskimi sodniki različnih sodniških list v Sloveniji. Kot merski instrument za raziskovanje smo uporabili spletni vprašalnik. Anketiranih je bilo 149 košarkarskih sodnikov. Podatki so bili obdelani s pomočjo računalniškega programa SPSS (statistical Package for the social Sciences). Za preverjanje hipotez smo uporabljali testa Hi-kvadrat in T-test za neodvisne vzorce. Statistično značilnost smo ugotavljali na podlagi petodstotnega tveganja. Rezultati raziskave so pokazali, da je glavni dejavnik, ki vpliva na začetek ukvarjanja s sojenjem, želja ostati v stiku s košarko po končani karieri. Vsi sodniki, ki sodijo v prvih treh košarkarskih ligah, se pred vsako tekmo ogrevajo. V četrti košarkarski ligi se jih 40% ne ogreva. Med sodniki, ki sodijo mlajšim kategorijam, se jih kar 57% telesno ne pripravi na sojenje. Večina sodnikov v prvi in drugi košarkarski ligi se ogreva 5min ali več. Ostali sodniki, ki se pred tekmo ogrevajo, pa porabijo za to od 1 do 10 minut. Večina vseh košarkarskih sodnikov se vsaj 1-krat tedensko ukvarja z organizirano ali neorganizirano športno vadbo. Med košarkarskimi sodniki so bile ugotovljene razlike v dosojanju različnih prekrškov. Pri potrjevanju hipotez smo bili delno uspešni. Ugotovili smo, da sodniki, ki sodijo v prvi in drugi košarkarski ligi, porabijo več časa za pripravo na posamezno tekmo, za analizo tekem in dodatno izobraževane kot pa sodniki, ki sodijo tretjo in četrto košarkarsko ligo. S 5-odstotnim tveganjem trdimo, da ne obstajajo statistično značilne razlike med košarkarskimi sodniki glede na pogostost aktivnega ukvarjanja z organizirano ali neorganizirano športno vadbo in sodnikovo igranje košarke v preteklosti. Tudi med košarkarskimi sodniki članskih kategorij in sodniki, ki sodijo mlajšim kategorijam, nismo našli razlik glede na pogostost situacij (nešportna ali osebna napaka, težko zaznavni koraki, mala ali velika osebna napaka, zadetek za dve ali tri točke, osebna napaka napadalca ali obrambnega igralca). Sodniki, ki sodijo članske košarkarske lige, se ne strinjajo z vpeljavo dodatne ocene sojenja s strani trenerjev in kapetanov. Na sodnike, ki sodijo več kot tri leta, manj vplivajo kletvice in žaljivke publike, igralcev in uradnih oseb kot na sodnike, ki sodijo manj kot štiri leta.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: Košarka, košarkarski sodnik, sodniške liste
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
• Organization: FŠ - Faculty of Sport
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-99910
• COBISS.SI-ID: 5279153
• Publication date in RUL: 21.02.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: The analysis of various influences on the quality of basketball refereeing by referees of different judicial lists in Slovenia

Abstract

The purpose of the master’s thesis is to compare and look for differences and similarities between basketball referees of different judicial lists in Slovenia. An online questionnaire was used as a measurement instrument for research. 149 basketball referees were surveyed. The data was processed with the computer program SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). For the verification of the hypothesis, we used the Hi-squared and T-test for independent samples. The statistical significance was determined on the basis of a five-percent risk. The results of the research have shown that the main factor that affects the start of a basketball referee’s career is the desire to stay in touch with basketball after the end of their basketball career. All the referees who officiate in the first three basketball leagues warm up before each match. In the fourth basketball league, 40% of referees do not warm up before matches. 57% of referees who officiate younger categories do not warm up before the match. Most referees in the first and second basketball league are warming up for 5 minutes or more. The rest of the referees who warm up before the match spend about 1 to 10 minutes for warming up. Most of the basketball referees are active in sport at least once a week in an organized or a non-organized sports activity. Differences were also found between basketball referees for officiating different offenses. We were partially successful in confirming the hypotheses. We found out that referees who officiate in the first and second basketball leagues spend more time preparing for each match by analyzing matches and they also participate in additional education more often than the referees that officiate in the third and fourth basketball leagues. With a 5% risk, we claim that there are no statistically significant differences between basketball referees, given the frequency of active engagement in organized or non-organized sports activities and referees playing basketball in the past. We did not find any difference between basketball referees of the membership categories and referees officiating younger categories, according to the frequency of the situation (unsportsmanlike or personal error; difficulty detecting steps; a small personal error or a big personal error; a hit for two or three points; a personal error of the attacker or defensive player). Referees who are officiating the membership basketball league disagree with the introduction of an additional assessment of officiating by coaches and captains. Referees who have been officiating for more than three years are less affected by the offensive language from the audience, players and officials than referees who have been officiating for less than four years.

• Keywords: Basketball, basketball referees, referees lists