izpis_h1_title_alt

ANALIZA PRITOŽB V UPRAVNEM POSTOPKU S POUDARKOM NA PODROČJU SOCIALE
ID KOZLOVIČ, BARBARA (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (977,15 KB)
MD5: 103D667A8152F5011A91A28CD8CF9683
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/65fefc6d-566d-4be8-a5c9-709ec9b204ab

Abstract
V diplomskem delu obravnavam nedopustne zaostanke pritožbenih zahtevkov, ki se kopičijo na Ministrstvu za delo, družino, socialne zadeve in enake možnosti. Temo obravnavam zato, ker je na socialnem področju uveljavljanje pravic iz javnih sredstev najpogosteje zahtevano za stranke v upravnem postopku. Pritožba je v upravnem postopku načeloma vedno dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače. Kot pravno sredstvo, ki izhaja iz mednarodnih in ustavnih določb, je namenjena varovanju pravic strank in javnega interesa zoper odločitev organov, za katero posameznik meni, da je z njo kršena njegova pravica. Skozi analizo empiričnih podatkov ugotavljam kršitve človekovih pravic zaradi pritožb, ki se rešujejo preko dopustnega roka na nadzorni drugi stopnji, in ki zavlačujejo uveljavljanje pravic na socialnem področju, ki je že tako zaradi narave samo po sebi občutljivo. Instančni organ, zadolžen za socialne zadeve, z neučinkovitim upravljanjem pritožbenih zahtevkov krši zakonske in ustavne določbe.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:pritožba, redno pravno sredstvo, Zakon o splošnem upravnem postopku, temeljna načela, konkreten upravni akt, Ministrstvo za delo, družino, socialno delo in enake možnosti, Varuh človekovih pravic
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-99003 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:19.12.2017
Views:1394
Downloads:464
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:APPEAL IN ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURE WITH AN EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL ISSUES
Abstract:
This theises discusses the inadmissible backlogs of appeals, accumulated at the Ministry of Labor, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. I am addressing the topic because in the social field, the exercise of rights from public funds is most often required for parties in administrative procedures. In principle, an appeal is always permitted in an administrative procedure, unless otherwise provided by law. As a remedy derived from international and constitutional provisions, it is intended to protect the rights of the parties and the public interest against the decisions of the state authority, for which the individual believes that the decision violates his right. Through an analysis of empirical data, I am identifying human rights violations due to appeals that are resolved over an admissible deadline at the supervisory second stage and delay the exercise of rights in the social field, which is already inherently sensitive in nature. The instant institution responsible for social affairs with the ineffective management of appeal claims thus violates statutory and constitutional provisions.

Keywords:appeal, regular remedy, General Administrative Procedure Act, basic principles, concrete administrative act, Ministry of Labor, Family, Social Work and Equal Opportunities, Ombudsman for Human Rights

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back