izpis_h1_title_alt

Karakteristike rezanja različnih materialov z abrazivnim vodnim curkom na stroju OMAX 2652A
ID Kotnik, Kristjan (Author), ID Valentinčič, Joško (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Lebar, Andrej (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (5,20 MB)
MD5: F75C5D866F8E9B82078E77C61AF5C912
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/daadc949-820f-49c4-9614-3fb421432d13

Abstract
V delu bomo obravnavali karakteristike značilne za rezanje z abrazivnim vodnim curkom (AVC). Rezanje z AVC je postopek konturnega rezanja. Karakteristike rezanja, ki vplivajo na kakovost reza so hrapavost površine, koničnost reza, napaka vogala in napaka vhoda-izhoda in so opredeljene v Švicarskem standardu SN 214001. Podatke pridobljene s pomočjo novo izrezanih vzorcev, na katerih bomo opravili meritve, bomo združili s podatki iz virov in podali komentarje, ali stroj dosega zahtevane vrednosti pri različnih kvalitetah reza. Ponovne preizkuse smo opravili na aluminiju in konstrukcijskem jeklu različnih debelin in tlaku curka. Ugotovili smo, da je hrapavost površine in koničnost reza funkcija izbrane kvalitete reza, medtem ko je napaka vogala in napaka vhoda-izhoda funkcija debeline obdelovanca.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:abrazivni vodni curek, aluminij, konstrukcijsko jeklo, steklo, hrapavost površine, napaka koničnosti, napaka vogala, napaka vhoda-izhoda, kvaliteta reza
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-98862 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:09.12.2017
Views:1885
Downloads:688
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Characteristics of cutting different materials with an abrasive waterjet on the OMAX 2652A
Abstract:
In this work the characteristics typical for abrasive waterjet (AWJ) cutting are evaluated and discussed. AWJ is a contour cutting process according to the Swiss standard SN 214011, the characteristics of cutting are sourface roughness, taper error, corner error and lead-in lead-out error. Data acquired through the newly cut samples is merged with data acquired from the literature review. The tests are repeated on aluminium and mild steel of various thicknesses, and various jet pressures. The results show the surface roughness and taper error depend on the selected quality of the cut, while corner error and lead-in lead-out error depend on the thickness of the workpiece.

Keywords:abrasive waterjet, aluminium, mild steel, glass, surface roughness, taper, corner error, lead-in lead-out error, cut quality

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back