izpis_h1_title_alt

Pojmovanja motečega vedenja pri specialnih pedagogih
ID Pavlin, Nina (Author), ID Jerman, Janez (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/4873/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Po navedbah različnih avtorjev soočanje z motečim vedenjem predstavlja pogoste težave staršem in pedagoškim delavcem. Do pojava motečega vedenja pride predvsem, če zanemarjamo ali spregledamo učenčeve želje, potrebe, interese in sposobnosti. V teoretičnih izhodiščih magistrskega dela smo najprej opredelili pojem moteče vedenje, skupaj z njegovimi značilnostmi in dejavniki, ki nanj vplivajo. Glede na raziskave različnih avtorjev smo pregledali pojav motečega vedenja pri posameznih skupinah posebnih potreb, skupaj z njihovi značilnostmi. Predstavili smo tudi načine odkrivanja in ocenjevanja motečega vedenja, preventivno delovanje v smeri njegovega preprečevanja ter možne oblike odzivanja nanj. Opisali smo tudi, kako se z motečim vedenjem soočajo učitelji in starši, ter opozorili na pomembnost sodelovanja učiteljev, šole in staršev pri obravnavi motečega vedenja. Opredelili smo tudi pomen osebnih pojmovanj v pedagoškem procesu. V empiričnem delu magistrskega dela smo izvedli raziskavo, v katero smo vključili vzorec 98 specialnih pedagogov iz vse Slovenije. Z njo smo želeli dobiti vpogled v razlikovanja med pojmovanji motečega vedenja pri specialnih pedagogih glede na njihove delovne izkušnje in vrsto vzgojno izobraževalnega programa, v katerem so zaposleni. Podatke smo pridobili z anketnim vprašalnikom, ki je vseboval tudi ocenjevalne lestvice. V raziskavi smo ugotovili, da glede na delovne izkušnje in vrsto programa, v katerem so specialni pedagogi trenutno zaposleni, prihaja do razlik pri pojmovanju motečega vedenja ter pri razlikovanju motečega vedenja in čustveno vedenjskih motenj. Razlikujejo se tudi pri soočanju in odzivanju na pojav motečega vedenja. Specialni pedagogi so ob začetku svojega dela prejeli približno enako količino podpore in pomoči s strani vodstva, sodelavcev in zunanjih strokovnjakov. Ob začetku svojega dela so se pri obravnavi motečega vedenja počutili manj kompetentne, kot se sedaj. Pri opažanju pogostosti prisotnosti motečega vedenja se specialni pedagogi pri skupini otrok z motnjami v duševnem razvoju, gibalno oviranih otrocih in otrocih z govorno jezikovnimi motnjami med seboj razlikujejo glede na vrsto programa, kjer so trenutno zaposleni. Glede na delovne izkušnje se specialni pedagogi pri opažanju prisotnosti motečega vedenja pri posameznih skupinah posebnih potreb ne razlikujejo. S pregledom številnih raziskav smo prišli do spoznanj, da je pogostost pojavljanja motečega vedenja precej velika, še posebej pri otrocih marginaliziranih skupin (sem spadajo tudi otroci s posebnimi potrebami). Ker na naše delovanje vplivajo tudi naša pojmovanja, smo želeli z raziskavo dobiti vpogled v razlike pri pojmovanju motečega vedenja pri slovenskih specialnih pedagogih, kar do zdaj še ni bilo predmet raziskav. Želeli smo poudariti pomen vplivanja naših pojmovanj na naše mišljenje, načrtovanje in odzivanje, v našem primeru še posebej v primerih soočanja s pojavljanjem motečega vedenja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:moteče vedenje
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-98294 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:11830601 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:13.12.2017
Views:892
Downloads:136
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Conception of disruptive behaviour at special education teachers
Abstract:
According to various authors coping with disruptive behavior represents common problems for parents and educators. Disruptive behavior occurs especially if we ignore or overlook pupil's wishes, needs, interests and abilities. In theoretical basis of this master thesis we have defined the notion of disruptive behavior, together with its characteristics and factors that influence on it. With regard to various authors we have examined occurence of disruptive behavior in individual groups of special needs together with their characteristics. We have as well presented the ways of detection and evaluation of disruptive behavior, preventive action for its prevention and possible ways of responding to it. We have described how teachers and parents cope with disruptive behavior and pointed out the importance of cooperation between teachers, schools and parents in addressing the distracting behavior. We have defined the importance of personal concepts in the educational process. In the empirical part of this master thesis we have carried out a study in which we have included a sample of 98 special education teachers from all over Slovenia. With this study we wanted to get an insight into the distinction how special education teachers define disruptive behavior in relation to their working experiences and the type of educational program in which they are employed. The data are the result of the questionnaire poll which included evaluational scales. In the study we have found that special education teachers define disruptive behavior differently, according to their their working experiences and the type of educational program in which they are employed, and that they also differently differentiate between disruptive behavior and emotional behavior disorders. There are also differences in their addressing and responding to the occurence of disruptive behavior. Special education teachers at the start of career receive approximately the same amount of support and assistance from the management, coleagues and external experts. At the start of career they were feeling less qualified in dealing with disruptive behavior as they feel now. In observing the prevalence of the presence of disruptive behavior special education teachers in a group of children with mental disorders, physically challenged children and children with speech and language disorders may differ according to the type of program in which they are currently working. Working experiences of special education teachers do not influence on their observing of the presence of disruptive behavior in individual groups of special needs. With the review of several studies we have come to conclusion that the prevalence of occurrence of disruptive behavior is quite high, especially in children of marginalised groups (which also include children with special needs). Because our concepts affect our actions we wanted to get an insight into the differences how Slovenian special education teachers define disruptive behavior, since this aspect until now has not yet been the subject of research. We wanted to emphasize the importance of the ways how our concepts influence our thinking, planning and responding; in our case especially in cases of coping with the occurrence of disruptive behavior.

Keywords:disruptive behaviour

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back