izpis_h1_title_alt

Razvoj preizkusa znanja za ugotavljanje napačnih razumevanj izbranih kemijskih pojmov pri predmetu Naravoslovje v 7. razredu osnovne šole
ID Trpin, Tamara (Author), ID Devetak, Iztok (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Slapničar, Miha (Co-mentor)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/4729/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Namen diplomskega dela je razviti preizkus znanja, s katerim bomo lahko pri učencih pri predmetu Naravoslovje, v 7. razredu osnovne šole, identificirali morebitna napačna razumevanja izbranih kemijskih pojmov. Poučevanje naravoslovja je kompleksno, predvsem zaradi abstraktnosti naravoslovnih, tudi kemijskih pojmov. Nepravilno predstavljeni abstraktni pojmi lahko pri učencih privedejo do številnih napačnih razumevanj. Raziskave so pokazale, da se pri učencih pojavljajo napačna razumevanja pri naravoslovnih predmetih npr. predmetu kemija in naravoslovje. Pri poučevanju ima pomembno vlogo učitelj, na samo razumevanje učne vsebine, pa tudi posameznik in njegova sposobnost vizualizacije naravoslovnih, tudi kemijskih pojmov. Napačna razumevanja lahko učitelj preverja formativno že med samim poukom z ustnim preverjanjem, lahko pa uporabi v ta namen sestavljene preizkuse znanja. Taki preizkusi znanja preverjajo razumevanje izbranih ključnih naravoslovnih pojmov. Ti preizkusi znanja so dvodelni, trodelni ali štiridelni. Sestavljeni so iz nalog izbirnega tipa z enim pravilnim odgovorom, poleg vsebujejo še naloge obrazložitve izbranega odgovora: »Pojasni, zakaj tako misliš?«. S tem se izognemo temu, da bi učenci ugibali pravilne odgovore, saj morajo izbrani odgovor obrazložiti. Poleg takega odgovora pa pri trodelnih in štiridelnih nalogah vprašamo učence po njihovi prepričanosti, da so posamezen del ali celo nalogo pravilno rešili. V prvem delu diplomskega dela je predstavljeno poučevanje naravoslovja, katera napačna razumevanja se pojavljajo pri učencih in pa katerim kriterijem – merskim karakteristikam mora ustrezati preizkus znanja, da ga označimo kot dober merski inštrument. V nadaljevanju sledi analiza razvitega preizkusa znanja: (1) težavnosti nalog, (2) objektivnosti, (3) veljavnosti, (4) občutljivosti ter (5) ekonomičnosti preizkusa znanja in ugotavljanje njegove ustreznosti.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:napačna razumevanja izbranih kemijskih pojmov
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-95893 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:11728969 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.09.2017
Views:999
Downloads:143
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The development of a diagnostic test to identify students misconceptions of selected chemical concepts in natural science subject in the 7th grade elementary school
Abstract:
The purpose of the thesis is to develop diagnostic test, to identify potential misconceptions of selected chemical concepts in students in the 7th grade of elementary school, in the context of natural science course. Teaching science is complex, mainly due to abstractness of natural science, including chemical concepts. Incorrectly presented abstract concepts can lead to a numerous misconceptions. Research has shown that misconceptions appear at science courses e.g. chemistry and natural science. Not only the teacher has an important role in learning, but also the individual and his ability of visualization of natural science, including chemical concepts. A teacher can check misconceptions by verbal verification or he can use diagnostic tests. Such diagnostic tests are checking understanding of selected key natural science concepts. For this purpose we use two-tier, three-tier or four-tier tests which include multiple–choice tasks with one correct anwser, in addition to these tasks they also include further explanation of the selected answer e.g. "Explain why you think so?" If the chosen answer must be explained, we avoid the possibility of students guessing the right answer. In three or four-part tasks we additionally ask students about how sure they are, that each part or even the whole task has been properly solved. Teaching natural science in general, different misconceptions that students have and which criterion - metric characteristics must exam have to be described as a good measuring instrument, is described in the first part of the thesis. The following is an analysis of diagnostic test: (1) the difficulty of the tasks, (2) objectivity, (3) validity, (4) sensitivity and (5) how economical and appropriate diagnostic test is.

Keywords:misconceptions of selected chemical concepts

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back