Ovrednotenje modula za katalogizacijo v sistemu COBISS3 : magistrsko delo

Levičar, Janja (avtor), Petek, Marija (mentor)

Prehod na modul COBISS3/Katalogizacija pomeni uvedbo sodobnejšega uporabniškega vmesnika in spremembo v konceptu ažuriranja lokalnih in vzajemne podatkovne zbirke, ki je bila povod za širše sistemske spremembe. Namen magistrskega dela je bil ovrednotiti modul COBISS3/Katalogizacija z vidika katalogizatorjev. Želeli smo ugotoviti zadovoljstvo s COBISS3/Katalogizacijo, prednosti/slabosti modula, vpliv modula na kakovost bibliografskih zapisov, mnenje o spremenjenih postopkih za delo v sistemu COBISS.SI, ter o centralizaciji katalogizacije in o vmesniku naslednje generacije, prilagojenem novim katalogizacijskim pravilom. Uporabili smo kvantitativno in kvalitativno raziskovalno metodo. S spletno anketo smo zajeli 133 katalogizatorjev z dovoljenjem za delo v modulu COBISS3/Katalogizacija, ki so v zadnjih treh letih kreirali največ zapisov v COBIB-u. Z metodo delno strukturiranega intervjuja pa smo spraševali 12 katalogizatorjev. Anketiranje je potekalo od junija do septembra 2015, izvedba intervjujev pa v aprilu in maju 2016 v knjižnicah iz različnih krajev. Katalogizatorji so bili z modulom COBISS3/Katalogizacija zadovoljni. Kot najpomembnejši prednosti navajajo črkovalnik in integrirane katalogizacijske priročnike. Moteča pa je predvsem povečana uporaba računalniške miške. Izobraževanje za delo v sistemu COBISS.SI je bilo ocenjeno visoko, vendar je bila izpostavljena potreba po dodatnem usposabljanju. Nekoliko slabše, a še vseeno dobro, so bili ocenjeni postopki za pridobitev dovoljenja za vzajemno katalogizacijo. Centralizacija je po mnenju katalogizatorjev smiselna za splošne, manjše knjižnice, manj za visokošolske in specialne zaradi problematike vsebinske obdelave in bibliografij. Ker modul omogoča dobre pogoje za delo, lahko v prihodnje pričakujemo zapise boljše kakovosti.

• Jezik: Slovenski jezik
• Ključne besede: vzajemni katalogi, online katalogi, COBISS3/Katalogizacija, katalogizatorji, uporabniški vmesniki, bolonjske magistrske naloge
• Vrsta gradiva: Magistrsko delo/naloga
• Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
• Organizacija: FF - Filozofska fakulteta
• Kraj izida: Ljubljana
• Založnik: [J. Levičar]
• Leto izida: 2017
• Št. strani: 201 f.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-94490
• UDK: 025.4:004.42(497.4)(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 64317538
• Datum objave v RUL: 31.08.2017

Sekundarni jezik

• Jezik: Angleški jezik

Izvleček

Introducing the COBISS3/Cataloguing module implied a contemporary user interface and changes in updating local databases and union catalogue in the context of broad system modifications. The purpose of the master's thesis was to evaluate the COBISS3/Cataloguing module from cataloguers' point of view. We wanted to find out whether cataloguers were satisfied with the cataloguing module. Its advantages/disadvantages and impact on quality of bibliographic records were examined. Also cataloguers' opinions about centralized cataloguing and next generation user interface adapted to new cataloguing rules, were explored. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research method was used. 133 cataloguers were surveyed via an online questionnaire, only cataloguers who possessed the cataloguing licence and who had created the highest number of bibliographic records during the last three years were selected. Afterwards semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 cataloguers. The online survey took place from June to September 2015. Interviews were conducted during April and May 2016 in libraries all over Slovenia. The cataloguers were satisfied with the cataloguing module. A spelling checker and integrated e-manuals were considered the most important advantages and increased use of a computer mouse was found disturbing. Professional training for the COBISS system was estimated rather high, however a need for additional training was observed. Procedures to acquire the cataloguing licence were rated only a little lower. According to cataloguers, the cataloguing centralization was appropriate for smaller public libraries but not for academic and special libraries due to subject analysis and bibliographies. In future we may expect records of higher quality as the module provides good working conditions for cataloguers.