izpis_h1_title_alt

RAZVOJ DAVČNEGA PROCESNEGA PRAVA IN PODROČNE JUDIKATURE V IZBRANIH DRŽAVAH
ID Vozel, Tjaša (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,13 MB)
MD5: 0F4E2019FDECF50A057AF25ECC906BCF
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/d1e522ed-e6d0-4f98-a015-cb4404654dd5

Abstract
Zakon o davčnem postopku določa vsebinski okvir postopkovnega davčnega sistema. Prvi ZDavP je bil sprejet šele leta 1996, ki mu je sledilo pet novel vse do sprejetja drugega ZDavP-1 leta 2004, ki je imel samo dve noveli, preden je bil sprejet tretji in trenutno aktualni ZDavP-2, ki ima do danes že deset novel. Magistrsko delo z analizo razvoja davčnega postopka ugotavlja spremembe in dopolnitve, uvedene z vsemi tremi zakoni o davčnem postopku. Analiza je pokazala, da so novele v izbrane institute uvedle veliko sprememb. Te so pripomogle k poenostavitvi davčnega postopka, odpravile nepotrebno administriranje, znižale stroške, povečale učinkovitost delovanja davčnih organov in zavezancem za davek zagotovile večjo pravno varnost. Zakon o davčnem postopku je od leta 1996, ko je bil sprejet prvi ZDavP, in vse do ZDavP-2, ki se je nazadnje spremenil z novelo ZDavP-J, ki je bila sprejeta v letu 2016, doživel največ sprememb na področju instituta dohodnine. Empirična raziskava judikatur Upravnega, Vrhovnega in Ustavnega sodišča v letih 2014 in 2015 v davčnih zadevah je zavrnila zastavljeno hipotezo, da je največ napak med javno dostopnimi sodnimi primeri s strani Upravnega, Vrhovnega in Ustavnega sodišča v davčnih zadevah v letih 2014 in 2015 najti glede napačne uporabe materialnega prava, ne pa postopkovnih kršitev. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bilo največ napak najti glede bistvenih kršitev določb postopka in ne zaradi nepravilne uporabe materialnega prava. Delo prispeva k davčni stroki in upravno-pravni znanosti. Rezultati dajejo smernice za učinkovitejše oblikovanje novih novel ZDavP-2 oziroma morebitno oblikovanje povsem novega Zakona o davčnem postopku.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Zakon o davčnem postopku, novele, davčno procesno pravo, razvoj davčnega postopka, zakonske spremembe, judikatura
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-92605 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.06.2017
Views:2535
Downloads:402
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Development of tax procedural law and sectoral case law in selected countries
Abstract:
Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia determines that the government imposes taxes, customs and other levies. The Tax Procedure Act (ZDavP) determines framework of the procedural tax system. In Slovenia the first ZDavP was adopted only in 1996. Five amending acts followed until the adoption of the second ZDavP-1 in 2004, which had only two amending acts, before the third and the current ZDavP-2 was adopted. The latter has had ten amending acts up until now. By means of the analysis of the development of the tax procedure, the master’s thesis ascertains amendments of the act, introduced by means of all the three tax procedure acts. The analysis has showed that amending acts to the selected institutes introduced many changes through the years. The changes helped to simplify the tax procedure, abolished unnecessary administration, reduced costs, increased the efficiency of the operations of the tax authorities, and ensured the persons liable for tax with increased legal security. Since 1996 when the first ZDavP was adopted and up until ZDavP-2, which was last amended by the amending act ZDavP-J, which was adopted in 2016, The Tax Procedure Act has experienced most amendments in the field of the institute of personal income tax. Empirical research of judicatures of the Administrative, the Supreme and the Constitutional courts in years 2014 and 2015 in taxation matters rejected the set hypothesis, namely, that most errors among publicly accessible cases of the Administrative, the Supreme and the Constitutional courts in taxation matters in years 2014 and 2015 occur with regards to misuse of the substantive law, rather than procedural irregularities. It was ascertained that most errors occurred with regards to the essential procedural irregularities, rather than misuse of the substantive law. The thesis contributes to tax profession and to the legal and administrative science. The results give guidelines for more efficient formation of new amending acts of ZDavP-2 or, potentially, a new Tax Procedure Act.

Keywords:Tax Procedure Act, amending acts, tax procedural law, development of tax procedure, statutory amendments, judicature

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back