izpis_h1_title_alt

Sodna praksa odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi iz krivdnih razlogov
ID Starič, Klemen (Author), ID Tičar, Luka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (434,48 KB)
MD5: BBBE62B92F0E618F5F2CE3ADEFD554BA

Abstract
Kršenje pogodbene ali druge obveznosti iz delovnega razmerja je opredeljeno kot utemeljen razlog za redno odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi. Delodajalec mora pogodbo o zaposlitvi odpovedati po postopku, ki je opredeljen v 85. in 89. členu ZDR-1, pri tem pa mora navesti pravilen odpovedni razlog, saj je v nasprotnem primeru odpoved nezakonita. Delavec pa lahko na podlagi tretjega odstavka 200. člena ZDR-1 zoper to odločitev delodajalca uveljavlja sodno varstvo v roku 30 dni od dneva vročitve odpovedi. Stališče sodne prakse je, da vsaka delavčeva kršitev, ki sicer predstavlja odstop od pričakovanega ravnanja delavca, še ne pomeni avtomatičnega utemeljenega krivdnega razloga. V kolikor je mogoče kršitve ustrezno razčistiti v okviru delovnega procesa in gre pri tem za zanesljivega delavca, je odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi nezakonita. Sodišča upoštevajo pri utemeljenosti krivdnega razloga vse dejanske in pravne okoliščine primera. Sodna praksa odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi iz krivdnih razlogov je relativno pregledna in dobro razvita. Delavcu in delodajalcu se zato izplača pred začetkom sodnega postopka poiskati relevantno sodno prakso glede spornega vprašanja. Na ta način se lahko tudi izogneta nepotrebnim sodnim stroškom.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:delovno pravo, delovna razmerja, odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi, krivdni razlog, sodna praksa.
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-88881 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:15428945 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.01.2017
Views:3220
Downloads:977
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:Unknown
Title:The case law of employment contract cancellation for reasons of misconduct
Abstract:
The violation of a contractual obligation or other obligation arising from the employment relationship is defined as a legitimate reason for ordinary cancellation of an employment contract. The employer can cancel an employment contract according to the procedure defined in Article 85 and Article 89 ZDR-1, as well as specifying the correct reason for cancellation, otherwise cancellation is illegal. Based on the third paragraph of Article 200 ZDR-1, the worker has a right to take legal action within 30 days from the date of service of notice of cancellation. The position of the judicial practice is that each violation made by a worker does not automatically represent substantiated reason of misconduct; even the violation represents a resignation from expected behavior of the worker. The cancellation of an employment contract is illegal if it is possible to deal with the violations in the context of the normal work process and if the violation is done by a reliable worker. The courts consider all factual and legal circumstances of an individual case to verify if reason of misconduct was justified. Case law in the aspect of the cancelation of employment contract by reason of misconduct is relatively transparent and well-developed. Therefore, before the beginning of court proceedings, it is rational that worker and the employer look for relevant case law about the issue in dispute. This way they may also avoid the unnecessary legal costs.

Keywords:labor law, employment relationship, cancellation of employment contract, reason of misconduct, case law.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back