izpis_h1_title_alt

Spoštljivost v deliberaciji : konceptualni premisleki, alternativna operacionalizacija in empirična validacija
ID Petrič, Gregor (Author), ID Atanasova, Sara (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/TiP2015_6_PetricAtanasova.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Spoštljivost komuniciranja je eden ključnih kriterijev kvalitetne deliberacije, hkrati pa tudi najbolj nejasen in problematično merjen pojem na področju raziskovanja deliberacije. Osrednji namen članka je predstaviti konceptualno-teoretične izzive pri poskusu natančnejše opredelitve pojma spoštljivosti, ki nato služijo kot prizma za evalvacijo veljavnosti obstoječih načinov merjenja spoštljivosti v deliberaciji. Na podlagi razprave o spoštljivosti kot dejavniku, ki vpliva na ostale komponente deliberacije, je osnovana hipoteza, ki služi preverjanju kriterijske veljavnosti. V empiričnem delu je na osnovi razprav o Družinskem zakoniku z uporabo logistične regresije ugotovljena šibka kriterijska veljavnost alternativnega merskega inštrumenta, ki pa odpira možnosti za nadaljnjo optimizacijo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:družinski zakoniki
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2015
Number of pages:Str. 1143-1166, 1247
Numbering:Letn. 52, št. 6
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-85436 This link opens in a new window
UDC:321.011:347.61/.64
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:33787229 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.09.2016
Views:1646
Downloads:234
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
Respect in communication is one of the key criteria for good deliberation, yet it is one of the unclearest concepts in the field of deliberation research with many critical issues in approaches to its measurement. The main purpose of the article is to present theoretical challenges in an attempt to produce a clearer definition of respect in deliberation, which then serves as a criterion to evaluate the validity of existing approaches to measuring respect in deliberation. On the basis of understanding respect as a factor influencing other components of deliberation, a hypothesis is formed which serves to analyse the criterion%s validity. When applying a logistic regression on a sample of discussions on the Family Act, the weak criterion validity of the alternative measurement instrument was found. However, this warrants further optimisation of the measurement instrument.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back