Dojemanje arhitekturnega objekta v očeh prebivalcev v ožjem urbanem prostoru

Mihalič Deškovič, Sara (author), Tomšič Čerkez, Beatriz Gabriela (mentor)

Sodobna panorama Ljubljane sodi v tranzicijski čas in se dinamično spreminja. Njeno podobo sestavljajo različni elementi ¬– stavbe, parki, infrastruktura ter trajne in začasne rešitve za različne namene, ki se bolj ali manj usklajeno prepletajo in dopolnjujejo ali pa motijo estetsko skladnost. Namen magistrskega dela je preučiti, kako ljudje sprejemajo spremembe v grajenem okolju. V tej luči sta še posebej zanimiva dva objekta, ki sta naletela pri prebivalcih Ljubljane na zelo različne odzive. Gre za zgradbi STANOVANJSKA HIŠA GRADAŠKA (zgrajena leta 2005) in KONDOMINIJ TRNOVSKI PRISTAN (zgrajen leta 2003), ki sta nastali pod arhitekturnim vodstvom biroja SADAR + VUGA. Arhitekte SADAR + VUGA zanimajo tisti arhitekturni koncepti, ki bodo na koncu dali rezultat novega arhitekturnega učinka in tisti, ki vzpostavijo novo socialno interakcijo in komunikacijo v družbi. Prav ti dve hiši – stanovanjska hiša Gradaška in kondominij Trnovski pristan – sta dobra primera učinka provociranja novodobnih arhitekturnih konceptov, ki povzročajo spremembe socialnega odziva. To pomeni, da imata potencial za socialno interakcijo v kontekstu sprememb znotraj nekega območja oziroma določenega okolja. Zgoraj navedeno velja za obe stanovanjski hiši v Trnovem – za hišo Gradaška in Trnovski pristan. Zgradbi sta med seboj oddaljeni le 300 metrov in sta umeščeni v podobno predmestno trnovsko okolje, razlikujeta pa se na ravni arhitekturne komunikacije. Novozgrajene hiše ne vplivajo le na bližnjo okolico in jo spremenijo, ampak tudi širše. Nekateri arhitekti želijo s formo in oblikovanjem poskusiti tudi spremeniti družbo. Del magistrske naloge je tako tudi preučiti, kako je SADAR + VUGA arhitektom z dizajnom obravnavanih hiš uspelo vplivati na spremembe v družbi. Od dograditve in naselitve zgradb je minilo že nekaj let in zanima me, kako prebivalci Ljubljane zgradbi sprejemajo oziroma kako poteka morebiten proces spreminjanja mnenja. Sta za njih zgradbi moteči ali pa sta jih zmotili samo na začetku, ker sta bili novi, drugačni, in so se kasneje navadili nanju ter spremenili svoje mnenje? Oziroma – ali je biroju SADAR + VUGA uspelo doseči nov pogled na sodobno arhitekturo in spremeniti odnos prebivalcev do le-te. V raziskavi je zame bolj pomembna edukativna plat projektov kot pa strokovno arhitekturna. Bolj me torej zanima, kakšen je medsebojni vpliv arhitekture in prebivalcev ter njihova interakcija kot strokovna tehnična izvedba objektov. Ob tem pa trčimo tudi na izredno pomembno in aktualno vprašanje razmejitve javnega in zasebnega.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: arhitektura
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
• Organization: PEF - Faculty of Education
• Year: 2016
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-83747
• COBISS.SI-ID: 11060297
• Publication date in RUL: 24.08.2016

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Architectural object perception of the residents in a closer urban area

Abstract

Modern panorama of Ljubljana is part of transitional period and is, as such, dynamically changing. Different elements are a part of its architectural appearance - buildings, parks, infrastructure, permanent and temporary solutions for different uses, which are more or less integrated in a symbiosis, or are disturbers of aesthetic appearance. The purpose of this master thesis is to study the attitude of citizens toward changes in time a space. As such were chosen two objects that were accepted with mixed emotions - RESIDENTIAL HOUSE GRADAŠKA (built in 2005) and CONDOMINIUM TRNOVSKI PRISTAN (built in 2003) and are works of SADAR + VUGA Architects bureau. SADAR + VUGA are interested in concepts that provide new impressions and create new social interaction and communication in society. Exactly these two buildings are a good example of provocative new age concepts, which are responsible for changes in social response. By providing that, they offer a potential for social interaction in the context of changes in a specific area or environment. The two buildings are just 300 meters apart and are placed in the suburban Trnovo area. However, they differ in architectural communication. Newly built houses have an impact not only on their surroundings but also widely in society. With all that on mind, some architects have been trying to change the society with form and design. Part of this master thesis is to study the intentions of SADAR + VUGA in designing the two houses and how they succeeded in impacting the society. Since some time has passed since the buildings were constructed, this gave us the opportunity to analyse how citizens of Ljubljana have accepted the buildings or how their minds have changed. Do they find the two buildings disturbing or were they disturbing only at the beginning when they offered a new perspective. Have the citizens gotten used to them, and did they change their mind. Have Sadar and Vuga succeeded in introducing a new perspective on modern architecture and did they change the people’s attitude towards it. All these questions are addressed in the study. More than with the architectural aspect, the study is concerned with educational impact of these two projects. Therefore, the focus is placed on the interaction between architecture and citizens; touching upon the ever topical question of delimiting what is private in public.

• Keywords: architecture