Regulacija in percepcija sovražnega govora : analiza dokumentov in odnosa urednikov spletnih portalov

Milosavljevič, Marko (author)

Članek predstavlja problem ustreznega poznavanja regulacijskega in samoregulacijskega okvira sovražnega govora v slovenskih medijih, in sicer na primeru urednikov spletnih medijev kot odbirateljev. Uporabljeni sta dve metodi, in sicer analiza ključnih dokumentov in poglobljeni polstrukturirani intervjuji z izbranimi uredniki slovenskih množičnih medijev. Ugotovitve analize kažejo, da določeni uredniki ne ločujejo med sovražnim govorom in razžalitvami ali kletvicami, kar kaže na slabo poznavanje pravnega okvira, pa tudi samega pojma sovražni govor. Analiza tudi kaže, da to lahko vodi v specifične odločitve urednikov in da so s tem odločitve o sovražnem govoru pogosto prepuščene individualni percepciji urednika

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: množični mediji
• Work type: Not categorized
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
• Publisher: Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani
• Year: 2012
• Number of pages: Str. 112-130, 232
• Numbering: Letn. 49, št. 1
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-77703
• UDC: 316.647:004.738.5
• ISSN on article: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 31097437
• Publication date in RUL: 30.12.2015

MILOSAVLJEVIČ, Marko, 2012, Regulacija in percepcija sovražnega govora : analiza dokumentov in odnosa urednikov spletnih portalov. Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja [online]. 2012. Vol. 49, no. 1, p. 112–130, 232. [Accessed 14 April 2025]. Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
• Shortened title: Teor. praksa
• Publisher: Fakulteta za družbene vede
• ISSN: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 763652

Secondary language

• Language: English

Abstract

The article analyses the way hate speech is interpreted by editors as key gatekeepers and definers of the editorial policy of certain media. Related to this is the question of how hate speech is defined in regulatory and self-regulatory terms and documents. The analysis is based on two methods: first an analysis of key documents that form the framework of Slovenian media and, second, in-depth interviews with editors of selected Slovenian (online) media. We found that certain editors do not differentiate between hate speech and defamatory speech and other forms of controversial or banned speech. These perceptions reveal a lack of knowledge regarding the legal framework of hate speech. The analysis also shows that editors of Slovenian online media donot have a precise regulatory and self-regulatory system and thus many decisions regarding hate speech are arbitrary