Details

Novinarsko opredeljevanje in razumevanje sovražnega govora
ID Erjavec, Karmen (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VJLMYKMX This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Ker v obstoječi mednarodni dostopni literaturi ne obstaja študija, ki bi razkrila, kako novinarji opredeljujejo in razumejo sovražni govor ter ga razlikujejo od napadalnega govora, skuša ta raziskava vsaj delno zapolniti raziskovalno vrzel. Intervjuji z novinarji osrednjih slovenskih medijev so s kvantitativno (analiza besedil) in kvalitativno analizo (kritična diskurzivna analiza) pokazali, da več kot tretjina intervjuvancev ne zna opredeliti sovražnega govora, preostali dve tretjini pa razlikujeta med konceptoma sovražnega in napadalnega govora. Raziskava je tudi pokazala, da imajo intervjuvanci skrajno negativno stališče do sovražnega govora ter ga prevladujoče povezujejo s sovražnostjo in nasilnostjo

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2012
Number of pages:Str. 95-111, 231-232
Numbering:Letn. 49, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-76278 This link opens in a new window
UDC:070:17
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:31097181 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.12.2015
Views:2547
Downloads:116
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
ERJAVEC, Karmen, 2012, Novinarsko opredeljevanje in razumevanje sovražnega govora. Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja [online]. 2012. Vol. 49, no. 1, p. 95–111, 231–232. [Accessed 26 March 2025]. Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VJLMYKMX
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
Due to the absence of studies in the literature to reveal how journalists define and understand hate speech and differentiate it from offensive speech, this research tries to at least partially fill the research gap. Quantitative (content analysis) and qualitative (critical discourse analysis) analyses of interviews with journalists from the main Slovenian media establishments showed that more than one-third of the interviewees cannot define hate speech,while the others can distinguish hate speech and offensive speech. The research also showed that the interviewees have an extremely negative view of hate speech and largely connect it with hostility and violence


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
  1. Farm income analysis of agricultural holdings in Macedonia using FADN methodology
  2. Posebnosti računovodstva kmetijskih gospodarstev
  3. Economic analysis of typical dairy farms in Slovenia
  4. Socio-economic structure of Slovenian agriculture between years 2003 and 2007
  5. The analysis of the state of agriculture and land-use of agriculture holdings 2000-2010
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
  1. Preživetje in podjetnost
  2. The use of econometric methods in family farm succession studies
  3. Farms' accounting in Koroška region
  4. Poslovni načrt za prevzem kmetije s strani mladega prevzemnika
  5. Konkurenčnost malih in srednje velikih podjetij v globalnem trajnostnem razvoju

Back