Vaš brskalnik ne omogoča JavaScript!
JavaScript je nujen za pravilno delovanje teh spletnih strani. Omogočite JavaScript ali pa uporabite sodobnejši brskalnik.
Nacionalni portal odprte znanosti
Odprta znanost
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Iskanje
Brskanje
Novo v RUL
Kaj je RUL
V številkah
Pomoč
Prijava
Public deliberation goes on-line? : an analysis of citizens' political discussions on the Internet prior to the Finnish parliamentary elections in 2007
ID
Strandberg, Kim
(
Avtor
)
URL - Predstavitvena datoteka, za dostop obiščite
http://www.javnost-thepublic.org/issue/2008/1/
Galerija slik
Izvleček
This article examines on-line political discussions' potential of becoming truly deliberative discussions, capable of bringing about democratic benefits,through combining two theoretically important aspects found in the literature - concerns regarding citizens' participation in on-line politics and the quality (or lack thereof) of on-line discussions - in one analytical framework. Specifically, the article firstly examines how many, and more importantly, which types of citizens participate in on-line discussions. This part of the analysis adds to the scholarly debate concerning whether on-line politics is reaching beyond politically active and interested segments of the public. Secondly, the article examines the discussions on four Finnish political discussion boards during the last three weeks before the Finnish parliamentary election in March 2007. The quality of the discussions is assessed and discussed in light of several criteria based on the literature concerning deliberative democracy. In combining these two aspects, the articlefills a gap in the research field where these aspects have mostly been examined separately. The findings of the article generally demonstrate that on-line discussions are not, at least for the time being, truly deliberative. The debates analysed generally did not meet deliberative standards in terms ofquality and only politically very active and interested citizens seemed to take part in them. The question thus still remains if, and how, on-line citizens' discussions can ever become truly deliberative.
Jezik:
Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:
Delo ni kategorizirano
Tipologija:
1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:
FDV - Fakulteta za družbene vede
Leto izida:
2008
Št. strani:
Str. 71-90
Številčenje:
Vol. 15, no. 1
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-75046
UDK:
316.77
ISSN pri članku:
1318-3222
COBISS.SI-ID:
27266397
Datum objave v RUL:
21.12.2015
Število ogledov:
300
Število prenosov:
84
Metapodatki:
Citiraj gradivo
Navadno besedilo
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:
Gradivo je del revije
Naslov:
Javnost = The public
Skrajšan naslov:
Javnost
Založnik:
Taylor & Francis, European Institute for Communication and Culture
ISSN:
1318-3222
COBISS.SI-ID:
40119808
Sekundarni jezik
Jezik:
Neznan jezik
Izvleček:
Članek obravnava potencial internetnih političnih razprav, da bi postale resnično posvetovalne. Prvi del obravnava pogostost razpravljanja na internetumed različnimi kategorijami državljanov. V drugem delu članke analizira kakovost razprav na štirih finskih spletnih mestih v dveh tednih pred finskimi parlamentarnimi volitvami marca 2007. Raziskava kaže, da razprave (vsaj za sedaj) niso resnično posvetovalne in da v njih sodelujejo lepolitično zelo aktivni državljani. Odprto ostaja vprašanje, ali (in kako) bodo razprave državljanov na spletu postale resnično posvetovalne.
Podobna dela
Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:
Nazaj