Vaš brskalnik ne omogoča JavaScript!
JavaScript je nujen za pravilno delovanje teh spletnih strani. Omogočite JavaScript ali pa uporabite sodobnejši brskalnik.
Nacionalni portal odprte znanosti
Odprta znanost
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Iskanje
Brskanje
Novo v RUL
Kaj je RUL
V številkah
Pomoč
Prijava
Kritičen pogled na novejše kvantitativne raziskave v slovenski ornitologiji
ID
Trontelj, Peter
(
Avtor
)
URL - Predstavitvena datoteka, za dostop obiščite
http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UMARN601
Galerija slik
Izvleček
Count (quantitative) methods in avifaunistics have been neglected in Slovenia for decades and have certainly not followed the development else-where. For e needs of nature conservation and of basic as well as ecological research, the bird populations should be counted and relations as to their numbers within communities astablished. The counting of breeding populations of separate, usually somewhat rare species has been relatively comprehensive and the only ones by which some favourable inceptions for more extensive regional or national monitoring have been set up. Among the methods involving the entire species spectrum, various transect methods, point counts, area counts and mapping have been mainly applied. The transect method during which the detectability decrease with the increasing side distance from the observer is taken into consideration is a possible alternative for the comparative studies. Due to its simpleness it is also siutable for more extensive monitoring and has been implemented in a number of countries. Point counts enable the greatest of mappings per time unit and very accurate descripton of the habitat around the mapping point. The territory mapping certainly remains the most accurate method (to the exclusion of the extremely time-consuming andin larger areas hardly feasible search for nests), and for this reason its unpopularity in Slovenia is unfounded. Competent commissions and boards shouldprepare some uniform recommendations for its use, such as have existed in many European countries for decades. The area count method with single or multiple counting and without territory mapping is extremely inaccurate and unreliable. It allows us to determine size classes for separate species at themost and is applicable only as a provisional measure for mapping of large areas in a single season. (Abstract truncated at 2000 characters.)
Jezik:
Slovenski jezik
Vrsta gradiva:
Delo ni kategorizirano
Tipologija:
1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:
BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
Založnik:
Društvo za opazovanje in proučevanje ptic Slovenije
Leto izida:
1996
Št. strani:
Str. 47-59
Številčenje:
Let. 17, št. 75-76
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-65582
UDK:
57
ISSN pri članku:
0351-2851
COBISS.SI-ID:
7116761
Datum objave v RUL:
10.07.2015
Število ogledov:
1062
Število prenosov:
107
Metapodatki:
Citiraj gradivo
Navadno besedilo
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:
Gradivo je del revije
Naslov:
Acrocephalus
Skrajšan naslov:
Acrocephalus
Založnik:
Društvo za opazovanje in proučevanje ptic Slovenije
ISSN:
0351-2851
COBISS.SI-ID:
7679234
Sekundarni jezik
Jezik:
Angleški jezik
Naslov:
A critical review of recent bird census work in Slovenia
Podobna dela
Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:
Nazaj