Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Protected areas, tourism and development of the countryside
ID
Zurc, Jana
(
Author
)
URL - Presentation file, Visit
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/95306/2/Zurc-Protected_areas%2c_tourism_and_development_of_the_countryside-242.pdf
Image galllery
Abstract
Connections between protected areas, tourism and development of the countryside were studied in the examples of the Triglav National Park and the Kozjanski Park. 200 local inhabitants were interviewed in each area. Accordingto the results, it can be concluded that the studied protected areas give an opportunity to develop rural tourism. It cannot be claimed that the development of tourism in protected areas is more successful than the development of tourism outside the protected areas. The interviewed inhabitants of the Triglav National Park most support the development of tourism in the area (86.5 %) out of all other industries, whereas this is not true for the interviewed inhabitants of the Kozjanski Park. The latter agree the area should be oriented in agriculture and the development of small business and craft. Nevertheless it is not insignificant that a high share of the interviewed inhabitants of the Kozjanski Park agrees on focusing this areaon tourism development (74.5 %). Almost half of the interviewed inhabitants of the Triglav National Park (47 %) and only 15 % of the interviewed inhabitants of the Kozjanski Park agree that the opportunity of the protected area is a better possibility in tourism business. Thus we can conclude that the Triglav National Park offers more opportunities or additional possibilities for business in tourism than the Kozjanski Park. In the protected area, where tourism is more developed (the Triglav National Park), the interviewed inhabitants believe that the nature conservation strategies are less successful and perceive more negative burdens of tourism (traffic and crowds, higher prices). On the contrary, in the protected area, where tourism is less developed (the Kozjanski Park), the interviewed inhabitants observe that nature conservation strategies are more successful and they are less influenced by tourism.
Language:
English
Keywords:
varovana območja
,
razvoj podeželja
,
turizem
,
Slovenija
Work type:
Not categorized
Typology:
1.08 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:
2010
Number of pages:
Str. 575-585
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-36309
UDC:
631.1
COBISS.SI-ID:
6450809
Publication date in RUL:
10.07.2015
Views:
1445
Downloads:
156
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back