Rumena grožnja : vzdrževanje novinarske avtoritete prek razprave o tabloidizaciji

Jontes, Dejan (author)

Članek se osredotoča na razpravo o tabloidizaciji, a z obratne perspektive, kot je to značilno za prevladujoče pristope, ki jo običajno razlagajo zgolj v okviru komercializacije. Z analizo komentarjev in intervjujev v t. i. resnem tisku skušamo pokazati, kako se skozi izgrajevanje ločnic med novinarstvom in nenovinarstvom oziroma pravim in nepravim (rumenim) novinarstvom vzpostavlja in vzdržuje avtoriteta novinarstva. Prav vprašanje novinarske avtoritete je namreč eden bolj zapostavljenih vidikov novinarskih in komunikoloških obravnav novinarstva, zato v članku "rumeno grožnjo" obravnavamo kot retorični ritual ohranjanja oz. popravljanja prevladujoče, objektivistične novinarske paradigme. Analiza komentarjev in intervjujev, ki v šestmesečnem obdobju v letih 2005 in 2006 v Delu, Dnevniku, Večeru, Magu in Mladini obravnavajo tabloidni tisk, pokaže na različne strategije, s katerimi se skuša "resno" novinarstvo ograditi od "rumenega", kot so poudarjanje epistemoloških in metodoloških razlik med obema vrstama novinarstva in ritualno izločitev posameznikov, ki kršijo pravila.

• Language: Slovenian
• Work type: Not categorized
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
• Year: 2009
• Number of pages: Str. 812-825
• Numbering: Letn. 46, št. 6
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-23057
• UDC: 070(497.4)
• ISSN on article: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 29071709
• Publication date in RUL: 11.07.2014

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
• Shortened title: Teor. praksa
• Publisher: Fakulteta za družbene vede
• ISSN: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 763652

Secondary language

• Language: English

Abstract

The paper addresses the tabloidization debate but from a different perspective than dominant approaches which narrowly connect tabloidization with commercialization. The author analyses commentaries on and interviews about journalism in the serious press and tries to show how boundaries between journalism and non-journalism or good and bad (i.e. yellow) journalism are defined through these discussions and how journalistic authority is established. He argues that the question of journalistic authority is neglected in the prevailing accounts of journalism and tries to show how the "yellow threat" is used as a rhetorical ritual for maintaining and repairing the dominant, objectivistic journalistic paradigm. The analysis reveals various strategies through which serious journalism tries to differentiate itself from the tabloid press, such as emphasizing epistemological and methodological differences between the two kinds of journalism and ritual isolation of individuals who break the rules.