Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Pomen družbene sprejemljivosti za uresničevanje okoljskih in prostorskih projektov : predlog sistematizacije merjenja
ID
Drevenšek, Mojca
(
Author
),
ID
Pek Drapal, Darinka
(
Author
)
URL - Presentation file, Visit
http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20086_Drevensek_Pek-Drapal.pdf
Image galllery
Abstract
V članku je z zornega kota uresničevanja projektov posegov v okolje in prostor obdelan koncept družbene sprejemljivosti. Članek uvodoma obravnava probleme, povezane z opredelitvijo in razumevanjem pomena koncepta družbene sprejemljivosti projektov. Pri tem črpa z različnih strokovnih področij, od socialne psihologije, okoljske sociologije, komuniciranja o tveganjih do okoljskega komuniciranja in raziskovanja v odnosih z javnostmi. Osrednji del prispevka in njegova temeljna ambicija je oblikovati (karseda univerzalen) predlog sistematizacije merjenja družbene sprejemljivosti okoljskih in prostorskih projektov. Zato avtorici prek kritične analize definicij družbene sprejemljivosti, iz katerih izpeljeta ključna problemska področja, oblikujeta predlog sistematičnega pristopa k merjenju družbene sprejemljivosti. Poimenujeta ga "Koncept 3-3-3 merjenja družbene sprejemljivosti". Koncept 3-3-3 merjenja družbene sprejemljivosti izhaja iz treh dimenzij družbene sprejemljivosti, v okviru vsake od katerih so opredeljeni po trije kazalniki družbene sprejemljivosti. Prav tako je podan predlog merjenja družbene sprejemljivosti s tremi vrstami virov (vhodnih informacij). Avtorici v zaključku obdelata implikacije tovrstnega merjenja družbene sprejemljivosti z zornega kota načrtovanja, izvajanja in evalviranja komunikacijskih aktivnosti, katerih namen je vzpostavljanje, ohranjanje oziroma povečevanje družbene sprejemljivosti projektov ter posledično njihovo uspešno uresničevanje.
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Not categorized
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:
2008
Number of pages:
Str. 752-777
Numbering:
Letn. 45, št. 6
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-22991
UDC:
659.4:502/504
ISSN on article:
0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:
28031069
Publication date in RUL:
11.07.2014
Views:
1247
Downloads:
230
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:
Teor. praksa
Publisher:
Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:
0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:
763652
Secondary language
Language:
English
Abstract:
Article discusses the concept of social acceptability from the viewpoint of environmental and spatial-planning projects implementation. In the introductory part the key challenges deriving from the concepts' definition and understanding are presented. Inputs from the expert fields of social psychology, environmental sociology and risk communication as well as from more specific communication-science fields of environmental communication and public relations evaluation are taken into account. The authors' key ambition is to develop an (universal) approach to systematically measuring social acceptability of environmental and spatial-planning projects. Therefore the introductory definitions of social acceptability are critically analysed and on this basis the key challenges of measuring social acceptability are identified. The approach called "3-3-3 framework for measuring social acceptability" is then introduced. The proposed framework results from three (3) dimensions of social acceptability each of which is constituted by three (3) social acceptability indicators. In addition, a draft proposal constituted of three (3) most commonly and frequently available sources (inputs) for measuring social acceptability of environmental and spatial-planning projects is offered. Authors also take into consideration and discuss the implications of the proposed framework for planning and implementing communication activities.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back