izpis_h1_title_alt

Nadgradnja klasifikacije težav, povezanih z zdravili po Evropski mreži raziskovalcev farmacevtske skrbi
ID Veršovnik, Klara (Author), ID Horvat, Nejc (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,00 MB)
MD5: 8450C6371DA171ECCE7A7F5C0AC3630A

Abstract
Farmacevtski poklic pomembno prispeva k zagotavljanju kakovostne oskrbe pacientov. Danes farmacevti ne skrbijo več le za izdajo zdravil, temveč pacientom nudijo vrsto kognitivnih storitev. Te storitve vključujejo: izdelavo osebne kartice zdravil, načrt zdravljenja z zdravili, pregled uporabe zdravil (PUZ), farmakoterapijski pregled (FTP), farmacevtske intervencije in beleženje težav, povezanih z zdravili. Slednje se pojavljajo na različnih nivojih, vloga farmacevtov pa je, da jih prepoznajo in o njih poročajo. Za razvrščanje le teh obstaja veliko različnih klasifikacij, ena izmed njih pa je tudi klasifikacija PCNE. Magistrska naloga je bila narejena z namenom prispevati k nadgradnji trenutne verzije klasifikacije PCNE za težave, povezane z zdravili (V9.1). Najprej smo iz komentarjev trenutne klasifikacije in predlogov za njeno izboljšavo, ki so bili podani v preteklih validacijah klasifikacije, v več iteracijah izluščili 30 najustreznejših predlogov. V Delfski študiji smo nato trideset strokovnjakov, ki so pri validacijah PCNE klasifikacije sodelovali že v preteklosti, povprašali o smiselnosti vključitve teh predlogov v klasifikacijo. V prvem krogu so sodelujoči sprejeli 17 od 30 predlogov (56,7 %), 13 predlogov pa je šlo v drugi krog Delfske študije. Drugi krog je potrdil, da mnenje skupine vpliva na mnenje posameznika, saj so se posamezniki po premisleku približali mnenju skupine in bili enotni kar pri 53,8 % predlogov (7 od 13), pri katerih v prvem delu ni bilo strinjanja. Skupno je bilo sprejetih 22 od 30 predlogov, saj so strokovnjaki v drugem krogu študije za dva predloga soglasno določili, da ju ne sprejmejo. Sprejeti predlogi bodo osnova za nadgradnjo klasifikacije PCNE. S strukturiranim pristopom smo uspešno identificirali ključne predloge za izboljšave in z njimi ustvarili osnovo za nadgrajeno različico klasifikacije, ki bo bolj prijazna uporabnikom in prilagojena sodobnim praksam v zdravstvu.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:težave, povezane z zdravili, klasifikacija težav, povezanih z zdravili, PCNE, izboljšava, Delfska študija
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-164678 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:07.11.2024
Views:99
Downloads:19
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Upgrade of the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification of Drug-Related Problems
Abstract:
The pharmaceutical profession plays a vital role in delivering high-quality patient care. Today, pharmacists go beyond dispensing medications and offer a wide range of cognitive services to patients. These services include creating personal medication records, developing medication therapy plans, conducting medication use reviews (MUR), performing pharmacotherapy reviews (PTR), providing pharmaceutical interventions, and documenting medication-related problems. These issues can arise at various levels, and it is the pharmacist's responsibility to identify and report them. There are several classifications for categorizing these problems, one of the most prominent being the PCNE classification. This master's thesis focused on improving the current version of the PCNE classification for medication-related problems through a Delphi study, aimed at achieving consensus among experts. Initially, 30 of the most relevant proposals were identified through multiple iterations based on feedback from the current classification and improvement suggestions made during previous validation rounds. In the Delphi study, we consulted thirty experts, all of whom had previously participated in validating the PCNE classification, to evaluate whether these proposals should be incorporated into the classification. In the first round, the participants accepted 17 out of 30 proposals (56.7%), while the remaining 13 moved on to the second round. The second round showed that group consensus influenced individual opinions, as participants reconsidered their views and agreed on 53.8% (7 out of 13) of the proposals that had not been accepted in the first round. In total, 22 out of 30 proposals were accepted, as the experts unanimously rejected two proposals in the second round. The accepted proposals will form the foundation for an updated version of the PCNE classification. Through this structured approach, we successfully identified key proposals for improvement and laid the groundwork for an enhanced version of the classification that will be more user-friendly and better aligned with modern healthcare practices.

Keywords:medication-related problems, classification of medication-related problems, PCNE, improvement, Delphi study

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back