izpis_h1_title_alt

Avtonomija, avtoriteta in zaupanje : virus in meje leta 2020
ID Strahovnik, Vojko (Author), ID Scasserra, José Ignacio (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (389,11 KB)
MD5: 0BFADA473F8D2A0182B73060B85C2551
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/zaloznistvo/bogoslovni-vestnik/bogoslovni-vestnik-81-2021-4 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Sodobni liberalizem v izhodišče postavlja posameznikovo avtonomijo. Zato ni presenetljivo, da sta leto 2020 in pandemija, ki ga je zaznamovala, razkrila pomembne meje tega pogleda, posebej ko je šlo za omejevanje svoboščin, ki so se pred tem mnogim zdele samoumevne. Članek obravnava povezani temi. Prva je ustrezno razumevanje pojma avtonomije – tu nasproti liberalističnemu pojmovanju postavlja kantovsko razumevanje avtonomije. Slednje je mnogo bolj prikladno, če želimo razumeti čas, v katerem živimo, in najti poti iz pogostih slepih ulic, ki so v povezavi z pandemijo nastale. Druga tema je zaupanje, ki se je tudi pokazalo kot izjemno krhko. Avtorja ponujata razumevanje zaupanja kot moralne in spoznavne vrline in hkrati izpostavljata, da so avtonomija, avtoriteta in zaupanje relacijski pojavi, saj presegajo razumevanje posameznika kot neodvisnega in razumnega delovalca in predpostavljajo drugega. Še več – predpostavljajo, da moramo biti kot posamezniki v deljenem, skupnem prostoru (političnem, moralnem, spoznavnem ipd.) z drugimi. Vrline, tako moralne kot spoznavne, nam pri orientaciji in delovanju v takšnem prostoru pomagajo. Problem sodobnega liberalizma je tudi v tem, da je privedel do pomanjkanja takšnih skupnih prostorov in pomanjkanja poudarka na ustreznih vrlinah, ki bi presegale vrline ,avtonomnih, racionalnih in neodvisnih‘ posameznikov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:liberalizem, avtonomija, avtoriteta, razum, vrline, zaupanje, pandemija
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:TEOF - Theological Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2021
Year:2021
Number of pages:Str. 867-879
Numbering:Letn. 81, [št.] 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-164042 This link opens in a new window
UDC:17.025.2:616-036.21
ISSN on article:0006-5722
DOI:10.34291/BV2021/04/Strahovnik This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:91393795 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:16.10.2024
Views:88
Downloads:8
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Bogoslovni vestnik : glasilo Teološke fakultete v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Bogosl. vestn.
Publisher:Teološka fakulteta
ISSN:0006-5722
COBISS.SI-ID:8745472 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Autonomy, authority, and trust : virus and the limits of 2020
Abstract:
Modern liberalism places the autonomy of the individual as a starting point. Therefore, it is not surprising that the year 2020 and the pandemic that marked it revealed significant limits of this view, especially as it concerns the restriction of freedoms that many had taken for granted before. The article deals with two related themes. The first is a proper understanding of the notion of autonomy, where we propose Kant’s understanding of autonomy as opposed to the notion of autonomy as defended by liberalism. The former is much more helpful if we want to understand the times in which we live and find ways out of the frequent impasses that have arisen in connection with the pandemic. The second is the topic of trust, which has also proven to be highly fragile. We offer an understanding of trust as a moral and epistemic virtue while at the same time emphasizing that autonomy, authority, and trust are all relational phenomena. They disprove the understanding of the individual as an independent, isolated and rational agent. They presuppose the other. Moreover, they assume that we as individuals must be in a shared, common space (political, moral, cognitive, …) with others. Virtues, both moral and epistemic, help us to orient and function in such a space. The problem of modern liberalism is that it has led to a lack of such shared spaces and to a lack of emphasis on appropriate virtues that would go beyond the virtues of an ,autonomous, rational, and independent‘ individual.

Keywords:liberalism, autonomy, authority, reason, virtues, trust, pandemics

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back