izpis_h1_title_alt

Antiestetika
ID Rogač, Paulina Pia (Author), ID Hribar Sorčan, Valentina (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (278,34 KB)
MD5: 2197A4B5A0131216D4CEB7A8A6A182BA

Abstract
Antiestetika predstavlja pomemben dogodek v razumevanju umetnosti, saj razširi in predrugači polje razumevanja, kaj šteje kot umetnost in kako jo ločimo od ne-umetnosti. Vznik pojma je pokazatelj časovnega trka modernizma in postmodernizma, ko tradicionalni estetski modeli več niso zadostni za opis umetniških del, ki na inovativen način izginjanja umetniškega predmeta naslavljajo vprašanja umetnosti. Pojem antiestetike se najbolj izrazito pojavi znotraj institucionalne teorije (Arthur Danto) v drugi polovici 20. stoletja v Združenih državah Amerike, kjer predstavlja odgovor na modernistično estetiko in uradno umetnost. Od tam se antiestetika kot interdisciplinarna oblika kulture širi na globalno raven in se trdno zasidra v sodobni umetnosti.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:ready-made, umetniški predmet, umetnostni svet, institucionalna teorija o umetnosti
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-163583 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:09.10.2024
Views:78
Downloads:10
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Anti-aesthetics
Abstract:
Antiaesthetisc represents an important event in the understanding of art, as it expands and transforms the field of understanding of what counts as art and how to distinguish it from non-art. The emergence of the term is indicative of the temporal clash between modernism and postmodernism, when traditional aesthetic models are no longer sufficient to describe artworks that address questions of art in an innovative way of the disapperance of the art object. The notion of antiaesthetisc emerges most prominently within the Institutional Theory (Arthur Danto) in the second half of the 20th century in the United States, where it represents a response to modernist aesthetics and official art. From there, antiaesthetisc as an interdisciplinary form of culture spreads globally and becomes firmly rooted in contemporary art.

Keywords:ready-made, art object, artworld, Institutional theory of art

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back