Terpene and terpenoid composition is a genotypic and also phenotypic trait that shows much variation across different cannabis varieties. Their profile in cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) is becoming increasingly interesting in pharmacy, mainly due to the possible synergy with cannabinoids. The aim of this thesis was to develop an analytical method for content determination of terpenes and terpenoids in raw cannabis flowers using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and to obtain their profile in different samples of cannabis flowers.
Attaching a next-generation multimode inlet, OPTIC-4, to a standard GC-MS system made it possible to analyze both solid and liquid samples. During the development of the method for analyzing raw cannabis material, a microvial containing the sample was heated at the injection port, leaving non-volatile impurities behind in the microvial, while volatile compounds traveled to the column. Under the same conditions as the raw cannabis flowers samples, we also separately recorded standard solutions of terpenes and terpenoids using OPTIC-4. In this method, we used direct column injection, which means greater method sensitivity. Additionally, we recorded standard solutions of terpenes and terpenoids using the classic GC-MS method, where split injection was used without the OPTIC-4 inlet. The conditions of both methods were set so that we were able to compare the retention times of terpenes and terpenoids between the methods.
With the developed method, we detected a total of 44 different terpenes and terpenoids in six analyzed samples of cannabidiol-dominant cannabis varieties. 16 compounds were identified using standards. Retention times recorded using the classic GC-MS method varied with RSD values of ⡤ 3,03 %. In the analyzed samples of different cannabis varieties, β- caryophyllene, α-pinene, or linalool were found in the largest percentages. The monoterpene and monoterpenoid content in the samples varied from 24,6 % to 60,1 %, and the sesquiterpene and sesquiterpenoid content varied from 39,6 % to 75,0 %. The advantage of the developed method is that it avoids extraction, which could lead to losses of analytes. Additionally, the method only requires approximately 1 mg of plant material for analysis, which is important when dealing with herbal drugs that are harder to obtain.
|