izpis_h1_title_alt

Diferencialna povezanost zadovoljenosti in oviranosti psiholoških potreb z duševnim zdravjem : magistrsko delo
ID Pongračič, Tina (Author), ID Avsec, Andreja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (813,19 KB)
MD5: 3E900E1BBBE0F6F1B6167F9C603354EB
.pdfPDF - Appendix, Download (48,73 KB)
MD5: CB45B4A36A0829DC5B10844DC5679755

Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo v sklopu mednarodnega projekta »Identitetne usmeritve in duševno zdravje mladostnikov: Preučevanje vloge temeljnih psiholoških potreb in kulture« raziskovali vlogo temeljnih psiholoških potreb pri duševnem zdravju 500 slovenskih mladostnikov. Duševno zdravje smo opredelili kot subjektivno blagostanje posameznika, ki smo ga merili na podlagi pozitivne čustvene naravnanosti in zadovoljstva mladostnikov z življenjem, duševne težave pa smo merili na podlagi negativne čustvene naravnanosti, anksioznosti in depresivnosti mladostnikov. Za teoretično izhodišče smo vzeli teorijo samodoločenosti Ryana in Decija, ki predvideva tri temeljne psihološke potrebe, in sicer potrebe po avtonomiji, kompetentnosti in povezanosti. Predpostavili smo diferencialno povezanost zadovoljenosti in oviranosti potreb z duševnim zdravjem mladostnikov, saj novejše raziskave predpostavljajo obstoj duševnega zdravja in duševnih težav kot med seboj ločenih, vendar povezanih kontinuumov, za razliko od preteklih pojmovanj, ki so duševno zdravje pogosto konceptualizirale kot odsotnost duševnih bolezni. Glede na rezultate multiple regresijske analize, v kateri smo na podlagi zadovoljenosti in oviranosti potreb napovedovali duševno zdravje, lahko govorimo o diferencialni povezanosti zadovoljenosti in oviranosti potreb z duševnim zdravjem in torej o dveh kontinuumih, saj se je pokazalo, da oviranost treh temeljnih potreb bolje napoveduje duševne težave, zadovoljenost treh temeljnih potreb pa bolje napoveduje subjektivno blagostanje, iz česar sklepamo, da gre za dva ločena konstrukta in ju je kot taka bolje preučevati ločeno.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:temeljne psihološke potrebe, teorija samodoločenosti, subjektivno blagostanje, duševne težave, duševno zdravje mladostnikov
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Pongračič]
Year:2024
Number of pages:47 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158727 This link opens in a new window
UDC:[159.923+159.97](053.6)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:199609859 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.06.2024
Views:303
Downloads:55
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Differential connection of satisfaction and obstruction of psychological needs with mental health
Abstract:
In our master's thesis, which was part of the international study “Identity Orientations and Mental Health in Adolescence: Examining the Roles of Basic Psychological Needs and Culture”, we investigated the role of the basic psychological needs in mental health of 500 Slovenian adolescents. Mental health is presented as the subjective well-being of the individual, which was determined based on the positive emotional attitude and satisfaction with life of young people, while mental problems were determined on the basis of the negative emotional attitude, anxiety and depression of young people. The theory of selfdetermination by Ryan and Deci, which assumes three basic psychological needs, which are autonomy, competence and connectedness, was taken as a theoretical background. We hypothesized a differential connection between satisfaction and obstruction of needs with the mental health of adolescents, as newer research assumes the existence of mental health and mental problems as separate, but related continuums, unlike past concepts, which often conceptualized mental health as the absence of mental health problems. According to the results of the multiple regression analysis, in which we predicted mental health based on the satisfaction and obstruction of needs, we can talk about the differential connection between the satisfaction and obstruction of needs with mental health and so about two different continuums, as it was shown, that the obstruction of three fundamental needs better predicts mental health problems and fulfillment of the three basic needs better predicts subjective well-being, which lead us to conclude, that mental health problems and mental health or subjective well-being, are two separate constructs and therefore it is better to study them separately.

Keywords:basic psychological needs, self-determination theory, subjective well-being, mental health problems, youth mental health

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back