izpis_h1_title_alt

Analiza kakovosti prikaza kroženja vode v učbeniških gradivih ter samostojnih delovnih zvezkih in naravoslovni dan na temo kroženja vode : magistrsko delo
ID Ravnikar Bobnar, Monika (Author), ID Torkar, Gregor (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (4,42 MB)
MD5: 6E69CBF36B1E65E871AF9B5258A21E5D

Abstract
Voda ima za naše življenje izjemen pomen. Brez vode življenje ne bi bilo mogoče. Vodni krog je eden od pomembnejših konceptov v ekologiji, vendar raziskave kažejo, da je znanje učencev o kroženju vode precej pomanjkljivo in površno. Učitelji in učenci znanja, ki ga imajo o tematiki, ne znajo združiti v shemo, ki bi zajemala vse komponente vodnega kroga. V raziskavi smo ugotavljali, kako je kroženje vode predstavljeno v osnovnošolskih učbenikih in samostojnih delovnih zvezkih, in s tem želeli učitelje opozoriti na pomanjkljivosti prikazov, na katere morajo biti pozorni. Da bo poučevanje vsebin učiteljem lažje, smo v magistrskem delu pripravili tudi predlog dejavnosti, ki jih učitelj lahko izvede pri poučevanju vsebin o kroženju vode v naravi. Predlagane dejavnosti smo pilotno izvedli v 5. razredu ene od slovenskih osnovnih šol in ugotavljali, kakšno je razumevanje vodnega kroga pred in po izvedenem naravoslovnem dnevu. Z opravljenimi analizami smo dobili vpogled v najpogostejše napačne predstave učencev o kroženju vode. Ugotovili smo, da so vsebine, povezane s kroženjem vode, v učbenikih in samostojnih delovnih zvezkih skladne s cilji v učnih načrtih in se po osnovnošolski vertikali nadgrajujejo. Največji poudarek na sistemu kroženja vode je v 5. razredu pri predmetu naravoslovje in tehnika. Ugotovili smo, da sheme kroženja vode v potrjenih učbenikih v šolskem letu 2022/23 in samostojnih delovnih zvezkih naravoslovja in tehnike za 4. in 5. razred ter naravoslovja za 6. razred večinoma ne vsebujejo vseh biosferičnih komponent (živali in ljudi). Vsebine, vezane na vodni krog, so v učbenikih razdrobljene, komponente pa niso povezane v enotno shemo kroženja vode. Risbe kroženja vode v naravi pri učencih pred izvedbo naravoslovnega dne so pomanjkljive – ne prikazujejo vpliva ljudi, živali in rastlin na vodni krog. Nekaj učencev ni prikazalo podtalnice, skoraj vsi pa so prikazali razumevanje pomena Sonca, ki poganja vodni krog. Po izvedenem naravoslovnem dnevu so risbe kroženja vode pri učencih bolj podobne popolni shemi vodnega kroga. Po izvedbi naravoslovnega dne je več učencev doseglo višji ali napredni nivo predstavitve kroženja vode kakor pred izvedbo. Število napačnih predstav po izvedenih aktivnostih se je zmanjšalo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Osnovnošolsko učenje in poučevanje, Biologija, kroženje vode, napačne predstave, slikovni prikaz kroženja vode, učbeniki, naravoslovni dan
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:M. Ravnikar
Year:2024
Number of pages:62 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158711 This link opens in a new window
UDC:556.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:200085251 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:19.06.2024
Views:267
Downloads:53
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis of the quality of representations of the water cycle in textbooks and workbooks and a science day on the water cycle
Abstract:
Water is of exceptional importance for our lives. Without water, life would be impossible. The water cycle is one of the most important concepts in ecology. However, research shows that students' knowledge about the water cycle is quite deficient and superficial. Teachers and students are unable to integrate the knowledge they have about the topic into a scheme that encompasses all components of the water cycle. Through our research, we aimed to determine how the water cycle is presented in elementary school textbooks and independent workbooks, and wanted to alert teachers to the shortcomings in the representations they should be aware of. To make teaching these concepts easier for teachers, we also proposed activities that teachers can implement when teaching about the water cycle in nature. The proposed activities were then pilot-tested in the 5th grade in one of the Slovenian elementary schools, evaluating the understanding of the water cycle before and after the natural science day. Through the conducted analyses, we gained insights into the most common misconceptions students have about the water cycle. We found that the content which is related to the water cycle in textbooks and independent workbooks is consistent with the curriculum and progresses through the elementary school levels. The emphasis on the water cycle system is the greatest in the 5th grade. We discovered that water cycle diagrams in the approved textbooks for the school year 2022/23 and independent workbooks for natural science and technology for the 4th and 5th grades, as well as natural science for the 6th grade, mostly do not include all biospheric components (animals and humans). The content which is related to the water cycle in textbooks is fragmented, and the components are not connected in a unified water cycle scheme. Drawings of the water cycle by students before the implementation of the natural science day are deficient – they do not show the impact of humans, animals, and plants on the water cycle. Some students did not depict groundwater, but almost all demonstrated an understanding of the importance of the sun driving the water cycle. After the natural science day, the drawings of the water cycle by students more closely resembled a complete water cycle scheme. After the implementation of the natural science day, more students reached a higher or advanced level of presenting the water cycle compared to before the implementation, and the number of incorrect representations decreased after the activities were conducted.

Keywords:water cycle, misconceptions, visual representation of the water cycle, textbooks, science day

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back