Introduction: The trend of increasing life expectancy and the growing number of elderly persons not only brings about numerical changes but also exacerbates ageism, which can affect each of us. The phenomenon equates elderly persons and discriminates them based on chronological age. It is pervasive and impacts multiple facets of society. It is also present in the healthcare system and institutional care for elderly persons. Stereotypical views of older persons among healthcare workers can lead to harmful practices. Ageism also exists among occupational therapists. Purpose: The purpose of this thesis was to deepen the understanding of ageism, encompassing both the broader healthcare context and, more specifically, the field of occupational therapy. We expanded the theoretical part with a quantitative study investigating the prevalence of ageism among occupational therapists employed in institutional care for elderly persons in Slovenia. We were also curious about how well-versed in gerontology they felt they were, as well as how often and how much they wanted to pursue professional gerontological education. Methods: Based on a review of professional and scientific literature, we established a theoretical framework and the foundation for the research part of the thesis. For collecting data, we designed an online survey that included demographic questions, the Ambivalent Ageism Scale and questions about knowledge and education in gerontology. For analyzing the collected data, we used the computer programs Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Results: Of the 93 occupational therapists in our sample, we observed a low level of ageism (2.70 ± 0.99). The frequency of benevolent (2.70 ± 1.01) and hostile (2.69 ± 1.30) types of ageism was found to differ very little. A statistical analysis showed that as occupational therapists age, their level of ageism decreases. Increased participation at professional conferences had no impact on the degree of ageism. Discussion and conclusion: Ageism represents a global challenge that necessitates critical examination within practical settings. Combating this phenomenon requires arming ourselves with knowledge. Nevertheless, knowledge alone is insufficient; gaining personal experiences with older persons is also invaluable. Occupational therapists should recognize their pivotal role in driving social change, acting as leaders in empowering individuals and, consequently, reshaping broader attitudes toward the older population. In addition to addressing the issue, advocacy against ageism actively contributes to the recognition, establishment, and appreciation of our profession.
|
