izpis_h1_title_alt

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception : comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
ID Pušnik, Luka (Author), ID Slak, Peter (Author), ID Nikšić, Stevan (Author), ID Winant, Abbey J. (Author), ID Lee, Edward Y. (Author), ID Plut, Domen (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (943,05 KB)
MD5: A3A2F8E4EC3929F871CF2F9D11A7C075
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception.

Language:English
Keywords:ileocolic intussusception, invagination, enema, ultrasonography, pediatric radiology
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 3257-3264
Numbering:Vol. 182, iss. 7
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-151962 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-053.2:615.8
ISSN on article:0340-6199
DOI:10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:162208003 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.10.2023
Views:450
Downloads:30
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:European journal of pediatrics
Shortened title:Eur. j. pediatr.
Publisher:Springer Nature
ISSN:0340-6199
COBISS.SI-ID:6044167 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:ileokolična invaginacija, invaginacija, klistir, ultrazvok, pediatrična radiologija

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back