Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Magnetic stimulation in the treatment of female urgency urinary incontinence : a systematic review
ID
Antić, Anja
(
Author
),
ID
Pavčnik, Maja
(
Author
),
ID
Lukanovič, Adolf
(
Author
),
ID
Matjašič, Miha
(
Author
),
ID
Lukanovič, David
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(730,77 KB)
MD5: BFDFC413A3D3F9C21165D465716AB032
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-023-05492-7
Image galllery
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis This systematic review analyzes published studies about magnetic stimulation (MS) treatment for UUI and determines whether this treatment is effective and non-invasive. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. The international standard for reporting results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was used to guide the methodology of this systematic review. The key search terms were as follows: “magnetic stimulation” and “urinary incontinence.” We limited the time frame to articles published from 1998, when the FDA approved MS as a conservative treatment option for UI. The last search was performed on 5 August 2022. Results Two authors independently reviewed 234 article titles and abstracts, of which only 5 fitted the inclusion criteria. All 5 studies included women with UUI, but every study had different diagnostic and entry criteria for patients. They also differed in their treatment regimens and methodological approaches to assessing the efficacy of treating UUI with MS, which made it impossible to compare the results. Nonetheless, all five studies established that MS is an effective and non-invasive way of treating UUI. Conclusions The systematic literature review led to the conclusion that MS is an effective and conservative way of treating UUI. Despite this, literature in this area is lacking. Further randomized controlled trials are needed, with standardized entry criteria, UUI diagnostics, MS programs, and standardized protocols to measure the efficacy of MS in UUI treatment, with a longer follow-up period for post-treatment patients.
Language:
English
Keywords:
magnetic stimulation
,
urinary incontinence
,
urgency urinary incontinence
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.02 - Review Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2023
Number of pages:
Str. 1669-1676
Numbering:
Vol. 34, iss. 8
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-151959
UDC:
618.1
ISSN on article:
0937-3462
DOI:
10.1007/s00192-023-05492-7
COBISS.SI-ID:
144311299
Publication date in RUL:
26.10.2023
Views:
738
Downloads:
56
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
International urogynecology journal
Shortened title:
Int. urogynecol. j.
Publisher:
Springer Nature, International Urogynecological Association
ISSN:
0937-3462
COBISS.SI-ID:
764180
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back