izpis_h1_title_alt

Cilj posvečuje sredstva : argumentativne zmote v primeru Smolnikar
ID Bjelčevič, Aleksander (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (89,43 KB)
MD5: F82953D7518E76615C3FBDC71EB30143
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://centerslo.si/simpozij-obdobja/zborniki/obdobja-29/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Bredo Smolnikar je družina Nakrst leta 1999 tožila zaradi razžalitve v romanu Ko se tam gori olistajo breze. Do oprostilne sodbe leta 2007 je bila pisateljica deležna široke javne podpore oz. obrambe. V obrambo je bilo zapisanih več kot deset vrst argumentov, vendar od tega večina napačnih. V prispevku analiziram sledeče argumentacijske zmote: a) prehitra posplošitev, b) zmota zmote, c) enostranskost, č) ad hominem, d) sprenevedanje, e) do onemoglosti. Prvi dve zmoti sta logični, zadnje so zmote iz relevance, kar pomeni, da so ti argumenti za primer Smolnikar nerelevantni.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:slovenska književnost, slovenske pisateljice, Zlate depuške pripovedke, Najbolj zlata dépuška pripovedka o ihanski ruralki, Ko se tam gori olistajo breze, argumentacija, kazniva dejanja, fikcija, razžalitev
Work type:Article
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2010
Number of pages:Str. 19-25
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-150663 This link opens in a new window
UDC:821.163.6.09-3Smolnikar B.
COBISS.SI-ID:44026466 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.09.2023
Views:397
Downloads:35
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Sodobna slovenska književnost : (1980-2010)
Editors:Alojzija Zupan Sosič
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete
Year:2010
ISBN:978-961-237-383-2
COBISS.SI-ID:253010432 This link opens in a new window
Collection title:Obdobja
Collection numbering:29

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
In 1999, Breda Smolnikar was sued for defamation in her novel Ko se tam gori olistajo breze. She received broad public support until a verdict of not guilty was reached in 2007. In her public defence more than ten different arguments were in play, but most of them were fallacious. The most frequent logical fallacies were the following: a) hasty generalisation, b) argument from fallacy, c) one-sidedness, d) ad hominem, e) pretended ignorance, f) argument from repetition. The first and the second are formal fallacies, the rest are fallacies of relevance.

Keywords:literature, fiction, argumentation, penal law, libel

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back