Without plastics and its versatile products, we can no longer imagine modern way of life. Excessive plastic consumption and improper disposal methods have heavily polluted the environment with microplastics. Once in the aquatic environment, microplastics are dispersed throughout the water column and can come into contact with organisms from various trophic levels. This poses a threat to the entire aquatic ecosystem and consequently to human health. Therefore, there has been a significant tendency recently towards the development of technologies for microplastics removal. Although current methods, such as membrane-based technologies, can remove microplastics from wastewaters, there is currently no method for removing microplastics directly from the aquatic environment. One promising technology for in situ removal of microplastics is phytoremediation, which involves using plant biomass to bind and remove microplastics. However, the application and advancement of phytoremediation are hindered by a limited understanding of the interactions between plants and microplastics.
The aim of this master's thesis was to investigate in the binding (adsorption) of polyethylene microplastics to a model aquatic plant Lemna minor, commonly known as duckweed. In the thesis, we showed that the adsorption of microplastics to duckweed is rapid, as the maximum binding capacity was reached after 24 hours. By varying the initial number of duckweed fronds, we obtained adsorption isotherms that provided a better insight into the interactions between the adsorbate (microplastics) and the adsorbent (duckweed) at equilibrium. The isotherms had a concave shape and low adsorption enthalpy, indicating the presence of weak interactions between microplastics and duckweed, likely of an electrostatic nature. After determining the optimal parameters such as incubation time, shaking, and the amount of plant biomass, a phytoremediation test was performed using both pristine and aged microplastics. We concluded that microplastics removal using duckweed was effective, as 80% and 50 % of pristine and aged microplastics was removed, respectively, within 15 days. Calculation of the phytoremediation potential revealed that the removal of aged microplastics was three times less efficient compared to the removal of pristine microplastics.
|