Bacterial systems such as E. coli are a popular choice for the production of recombinant proteins due to their affordability, simplicity, short generation time of the organism, and well-studied genetics. However, expressing proteins in E. coli also has certain limitations such as the inability to perform post-translational modifications and protein aggregation tendency of heterologous proteins. These hindrances can often lead to unsuccessful preparation of eukaryotic proteins, which can be resolved by appropriate adjustments of preparation parameters. Two common adaptations that often enable higher yields of preparation are the use of specialized strains and co-expression with chaperones.
Since the formation of disulfide bonds in establishing the correct protein structure is often a rate-limiting step, we decided to compare two bacterial systems, which enable disulfide bond formation in the cytoplasm of bacteria. Therefore, we prepared mouse procathepsin L, a protein that contains three disulfide bonds in its native structure, in a specialized strain called Rosetta-gami 2 (DE3) and in a classical expression strain BL21 (DE3) pLysS. In the BL21 (DE3) strain, we employed the CyDisCo system, which facilitates the establishment of disulfide bonds in the reducing environment of the bacterial cytoplasm through co-expression with chaperones. The experiment was conducted in four replicates, as we were interested not only in the influence of the bacterial strain but also in how the presence of either LB or TB growth medium affects the success of preparing mouse procathepsin L in its native form.
Using the IVA technique, we inserted the gene for mouse procathepsin L into the selected expression vector and prepared the protein in both selected systems. Besides investigating the impact of the expression system, we also examined how the choice of growth media affected the preparation of the selected protein in both expression systems. The prepared mouse procathepsin L was isolated using nickel affinity chromatography and activated. Afterwards, its active concentration was determined with titration of the active site.
In both expression systems, we managed to successfully prepare active mouse cathepsin L with slightly higher preparation yields in the combination of the Rosetta-gami 2 (DE3) strain with LB growth medium and the CyDisCo system with TB growth medium. Based on the presented results, it is best to use these specific combinations of the expression system and growth media for further optimization of mouse cathepsin L preparation conditions.
|