Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Wolf genetic diversity compared across Europe using the yardstick method : research data
ID
Jan, Maja
(
Author
),
ID
Stronen, Astrid Vik
(
Author
),
ID
Boljte, Barbara
(
Author
),
ID
Černe, Rok
(
Author
),
ID
Huber, Đuro
(
Author
),
ID
Iosif, Ruben
(
Author
),
ID
Kljun, Franc
(
Author
),
ID
Konec, Marjeta
(
Author
),
ID
Kos, Ivan
(
Author
),
ID
Krofel, Miha
(
Author
),
ID
Kusak, Josip
(
Author
),
ID
Luštrik, Roman
(
Author
),
ID
Majić Skrbinšek, Aleksandra
(
Author
),
ID
Promberger–Füerpass, Barbara
(
Author
),
ID
Potočnik, Hubert
(
Author
),
ID
Rigg, Robin
(
Author
),
ID
Trontelj, Peter
(
Author
),
ID
Skrbinšek, Tomaž
(
Author
)
XLSX - Research data,
Download
(147,01 KB)
MD5: A16873A3FC93D900890149155C425501
Description: XLSX file contains a table of genotypes for the wolves and dogs studied
DOCX - Data description,
Download
(21,64 KB)
MD5: 894CC2D346CAADC6DE01CC14113AFAE0
Image galllery
Abstract
Integrating data across studies with traditional microsatellite genetic markers requires careful calibration and represents an obstacle for investigation of wide-ranging species where populations require transboundary management. We used the “yardstick” method to compare results published across Europe since 2002 and new wolf (Canis lupus) genetic profiles from the Carpathian Mountains in Central Europe and the Dinaric Mountains in Southeastern Europe, with the latter as our reference population. We compared each population with Dinaric wolves, considering only shared markers (range 4-17). For each population, we calculated standard genetic diversity indices plus calibrated heterozygosity (Hec) and allelic richness (Ac). Hec and Ac in Dinaric (0.704 and 9.394) and Carpathian wolves (0.695 and 7.023) were comparable to those observed in other large and mid-sized European populations, but smaller than those of northeastern Europe. Major discrepancies in marker choices among some studies made comparisons more difficult. However, the yardstick method, including the new measures of Hec and Ac, provided a direct comparison of genetic diversity values among wolf populations and an intuitive interpretation of the results. The yardstick method thus permitted the integration of diverse sources of publicly available microsatellite data for spatiotemporal genetic monitoring of evolutionary potential.
Language:
English
Keywords:
allelic richness
,
calibration
,
Canis lupus
,
comparative analyses
,
microsatellites
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:
2023
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-148315-810a74c2-e89e-2bf5-4bb1-45d3920750d6
Data col. methods:
Compilation
Publication date in RUL:
11.08.2023
Views:
1020
Downloads:
60
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Projects
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P1-0184
Name:
Integrativna zoologija in speleobiologija
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P4-0059
Name:
Gozd, gozdarstvo in obnovljivi gozdni viri
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
LIFE
Project number:
LIFE08 NAT/SLO/000244
Acronym:
SloWolf
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
LIFE
Project number:
LIFE18 NAT/IT/000972
Acronym:
WolfAlps
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
Bernd Thies Foundation
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
UK Wolf Conservation Trust
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
EURONATUR
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
Croatian Agency for Nature and Environment
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
“Sjeverni Velebit” National Park
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
“Velebit” Nature Park
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
“Plitvice Lakes” National Park
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Project number:
07.0307/2013/654446/SER/B.3
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
OAK Foundation
Project number:
OCAY-11-136
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
Environment
Project number:
SMIS 102086
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back