Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Pravnopolitični pogled na doktrino nujnih zmogljivosti : analiza stanja in pomen "nepogrešljivosti"
ID
Dacar, Rok
(
Author
),
ID
Ferčič, Aleš
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(440,40 KB)
MD5: F4741F1EA37A72C38A864D0E0742F40D
Image galllery
Abstract
Doktrina nujne zmogljivosti je institut konkurenčnega prava, po katerem mora podjetje, ki ima na zgornjem trgu (nujne zmogljivosti) prevladujoč položaj, omogočiti dostop do te zmogljivosti, ki je nepogrešljiva za delovanje na spodnjem, vertikalno povezanem, trgu, tretjim podjetjem, ki želijo na tem trgu delovati. Natančni pogoji za njeno aktivacijo so zaradi nedosledne, čeprav obsežne prakse Evropske komisije in Sodišča Evropske unije nejasni. Prispevek poskuša z analizo nekaterih najpomembnejših sodb s področja doktrine nujne zmogljivosti ugotoviti, katere pogoje morajo za to, da je doktrino mogoče uporabiti, izpolniti posamezne vrste zmogljivosti (materializirane, nematerializirane in pravice intelektualne lastnine). Prav tako pa se tudi opredeli do v literaturi pogostih očitkov, da je praksa Evropske komisije in Sodišča Evropske unije s področja doktrine nujne zmogljivosti samovoljna. Čeprav je praksa resnično nedosledna, pa ni tudi samovoljna, saj jo je treba razumeti v luči spreminjajočih ciljev, ki jih skozi čas zasledujeta konkurenčna politika in konkurenčno pravo.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
doktrina nujne zmogljivosti
,
konkurenčno pravo
,
konkurenčna politika
,
kriterij novega proizvoda
,
tehnični napredek
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2022
Year:
2022
Number of pages:
Str. 97-120, 398, 414
Numbering:
Letn. 82
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-144686
UDC:
347.72:347.9
ISSN on article:
1854-3839
DOI:
10.51940/2022.1.97-120
COBISS.SI-ID:
132676355
Publication date in RUL:
08.03.2023
Views:
546
Downloads:
98
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Zbornik znanstvenih razprav
Shortened title:
Zb. znan. razpr.
Publisher:
Pravna fakulteta
ISSN:
1854-3839
COBISS.SI-ID:
223437312
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
A legal policy view on the essential facilities doctrine: the state of affairs and the meaning of "indispensability"
Abstract:
Under the essential facilities doctrine companies with a dominant position on the upstream market of a facility that is an essential input for competition on the downstream market must grant access to that facility (good or service) to companies that want to compete on the downstream market. The exact conditions for the use of the essential facilities doctrine are inconsistent and unclear despite the rich case law from both the European Commission and the European Court of Justice on the topic. Through the analysis of some of the landmark cases concerning the essential facilities doctrine, the article attempts to define which condition different types of facilities (materialised, immaterialised, and intellectual property rights) must fulfil for the essential facilities doctrine to be applied. The article also addresses the critique presented by a considerable number of commentators that the case law of the European Commission and of the European Court of Justice regarding the essential facilities doctrine is arbitrary. Although the case law is indeed inconsistent it is not arbitrary as the changes regarding the goals that competition policy and competition law are pursuing through time must also be considered.
Keywords:
the essential facilities doctrine
,
competition law
,
competition policy
,
the new product criteria
,
technical progress
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back