Fungal infections are opportunistic in our geographic area and most often occur in immunocompromised individuals. With the development of new antifungals and the ever-increasing interest and need for these drugs, antifungal sensitivity testing is also developing. We are familiar with reference methods and several forms of commercially available sensitivity testing methods. In this Master's thesis we wanted to define the distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antifungals for medically important fungi, which were isolated from clinical samples in the Laboratory for Fungal Infections at the Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana (IMI MF UL). These were compared with MIC distributions from the European Commission Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) database, which were obtained using the reference microdilution method. We included 27 different medically important fungi in the analysis. We obtained data on MIC using the gradient diffusion method, the vast majority of which were already in the database of the IMI information system (MBL), if there was no data available, we performed additional testing for newer antifungals or rarer isolates. MIC results were compared with data obtained using the reference microdilution method defined by EUCAST. Where possible, we defined the wild-type upper limit (wtUL). We found that the MIC values with both methods for Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus niger agree in more than 95 % if we consider a range of two two-fold dilutions. We found that all of the less common yeast isolates had fluconazole wtUL higher (80 %) or equal (20 %) to the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) of Candida albicans. The wtUL values for isavuconazole for the most frequently isolated fungi from the Mucorales group and ECOFF of A. fumigatus were consistent, while the wtUL for posaconazole was two and four two-fold dilutions higher than for Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp..
|