izpis_h1_title_alt

Dojemanje zaključka terapevtskega procesa z vidika terapevtov : magistrsko delo
ID Žvikart, Sara (Author), ID Cvetek, Mateja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,72 MB)
MD5: 9154BBD7084719CC74AD2A01D40A69DB

Abstract
Z magistrskim delom je avtorica želela odgovoriti na vprašanje, katera področja zaključevanja terapevtskega procesa preko svojih izkušenj izpostavljajo terapevti. V raziskavi je sodelovalo devet udeležencev z zaključeno terapevtsko izobrazbo. Avtorica je s pomočjo metode osnovane teorije opravila analizo polstrukturiranih intervjujev in dobljene rezultate razvrstila na sedem glavnih področij: razumevanje zaključevanje v širšem kontekstu terapevtskega procesa, dinamika zaključevanja skupne poti, terapevt kot (ne)popisan list, ali so vsi klienti enaki, kako reči nasvidenje, kaj ostane po koncu in kadar ni zaključka. V sklepnem delu naloge je avtorica preverila odnose znotraj glavnih kategorij in te povezala z drugimi podkategorijami ter obstoječo literaturo. Zaključevanje terapevtskega procesa ni enkratni dogodek, ampak je zaključevanje procesno in predstavlja pomembno fazo terapevtskega procesa, v kateri se zrcalijo vse pretekle faze. Na zaključek skupne poti med terapevti in klienti vpliva več dejavnikov. Med najpomembnejšimi dejavniki na strani terapevtov, terapevti prepoznavajo svoje pretekle izkušnje separacij in osebno izkušnjo zaključka terapevtskega procesa. Koliko pozornosti je smiselno nameniti zaključevanju, pa je v veliki meri odvisno od preteklih izkušenj izgub in ločitev klienta in pomembnosti, ki jo za klienta predstavlja terapevtski odnos. Zaključek terapevtskega odnosa je pomemben tako za klienta kot tudi za terapevta, zato si je za zaključek smiselno vzeti dovolj časa. Med pomembnejšimi temami v času zaključevanja terapevti izpostavljajo refleksijo terapevtskega procesa in terapevtskega odnosa ter načrtovanje prihodnosti klienta. Čeprav se klient in terapevt več ne srečujeta, pa se terapevtski proces z zadnjim srečanjem ne konča, ampak se nadaljuje preko klientove ponotranjene izkušnje odnosa s terapevtom. Sestavni del terapevtske prakse predstavljajo tudi prekinitve terapevtskih procesov, ki terapevtom pogosto pustijo več odprtih vprašanj. Ostaja vprašanje, kako terapevte ustrezno pripraviti na spoprijemanje z nezaključenimi terapevtskimi procesi in kako lahko terapevti brez sodelovanja klienta, zaprejo terapevtski proces. Naloga predstavlja pomemben doprinos pri osvetlitvi širšega razumevanja zaključne faze in zaključka terapevtskega procesa ter njunega pomena za terapevte. Tema zaključevanja je v tuji strokovni literaturi precej raziskana, medtem ko predstavlja na slovenskem področju velik manko tako v literaturi kot v izobraževalnem procesu terapevtov. Rezultati raziskovalnega dela prinašajo pomemben doprinos za klinično prakso terapevtov ter ponujajo priložnost za premislek, kako podobno kot začetku terapevtskega procesa tudi koncu nameniti zasluženo pozornost.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:zaključna faza, zaključek terapevtskega procesa, izguba, terapevtski odnos, post-terapevtski proces
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:TEOF - Theological Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[S. Agrež]
Year:2022
Number of pages:VII, 116 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-142760 This link opens in a new window
UDC:159.964:615(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:132692483 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.11.2022
Views:544
Downloads:150
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Therapists’ perception of the therapeutic process at termination
Abstract:
In this master thesis, the author sought to answer the question of which aspects of therapy termination are highlighted by therapists on the basis of their experiences. Nine participants with a therapeutic education took part in the study. The author applied grounded theory to analyse the semi-structured interviews and categorise the results into seven main areas: understanding termination in the broader context of the therapeutic process, the dynamics of terminating the shared journey, the therapist as a (non-)blank slate, whether all clients are the same, how to say goodbye, what remains after termination and when there is no termination. In the concluding section of the thesis, the author examined the relationships within the main categories and collated them with other subcategories and existing literature. Termination of therapy is not a one-off event, but rather a process and an important phase of the therapeutic process that reflects all the previous phases. Several factors influence the conclusion of the shared journey between therapists and clients. As some of the most important factors on their part, therapists identified their past experiences with separations and their personal experience with therapy termination. How much attention should be devoted to termination depends largely on the client’s past experiences with loss and separation and the significance of the therapeutic relationship for the client. Since it is important for both the client and the therapist, it is prudent to devote sufficient time to terminating the therapeutic relationship. Among the most important topics during the termination process, therapists highlighted reflecting on the therapeutic process and the therapeutic relationship, as well as outlining plans for the client’s future. Although the client and therapist will no longer meet, the therapeutic process does not end with the final session, but continues through the client’s internalised experience of their relationship with the therapist. Premature termination of therapy is an integral part of therapeutic practice that often leaves therapists with several unanswered questions. The question remains how to adequately prepare therapists to deal with client dropouts where therapy is not properly terminated and how therapists can terminate the therapeutic process without the client’s participation. The thesis makes an important contribution in shedding light on the broader understanding of the final phase and termination of therapy and their significance for therapists. While the topic of termination has been well researched in foreign literature, it represents a major gap in Slovenia in both literature and the educational process for therapists. The results of this research constitute a significant contribution to the clinical practice of therapists and offer an opportunity to reflect on how to give termination, similarly to the start of therapy, the attention it deserves.

Keywords:termination phase, termination of therapy, loss, therapeutic relationship, post-therapy process

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back