izpis_h1_title_alt

Ekonomska upravičenost naložbe v nov hlev za pitovne piščance
ID Pižorn, Luka (Author), ID Žgajnar, Jaka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,59 MB)
MD5: A461D4700448FCCFF1BA53595379026B

Abstract
V nalogi smo naredili ekonomsko analizo dveh različnih hlevov za pitovne piščance. Hleva se razlikujeta po sistemu uhlevitve in tehnologiji reje. Analizirali smo donosnost obeh naložb, pri tem pa smo predpostavili tri različne scenarije. S tem smo poizkušali zajeti različne pogoje in posredno izvesti tudi občutljivosti enega in drugega projekta. Tako smo spreminjali število turnusov, spremembo prodajne cene in spremembo proizvodnih stroškov. Pri izvedeni analizi smo ugotovili, da največjo donosnost prinaša hlev pri varianti A, kljub večjim začetnim vlaganjem. Slabše ekonomske rezultate pa bi dosegli pri varianti B, ki ima sicer nižja začetna vlaganja. Pri varianti A, kjer je kapaciteta hleva 27.115 živali se izkaže, da zahtevano stopnjo donosa 6 % dosežemo že pri šestih turnusih letno (ISD je 6,1 %). Pri varianti B pa bi morali za primerljiv poslovni rezultat izvesti 7 turnusov. Pri tem bi dosegli sicer 6,4 % interno stopnjo donosa. Pričakovano se izkaže, da imajo tako prodajne cene, kot tudi stroški zelo pomemben vpliv na upravičenost izvedbe ene ali druge naložbe. Ob enakih pogojih sprememb (15 %) se izkaže, da je varianta A, manj občutljiva in bi jo predlagali za izvedbo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:perutnina, pitovni piščanci, hlevi, naložbe, ekonomika
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-141682 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:124935427 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.10.2022
Views:6819
Downloads:83
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Economic viability of an investment in a new broiler house
Abstract:
In this thesis, we have carried out an economic analysis of two different broiler houses. They differ in their housing system and rearing technology. We analysed the return on investment of the two investments, assuming three different scenarios. In this way, we have tried to capture the different conditions and, indirectly, the sensitivities of one project and the other. Thus, we varied the number of batches of poultry, the change in the selling price and the change in production costs. The analysis showed that the highest profitability was achieved by the barn in variant A, despite the higher initial investment. However, the economic results would be worse for variant B, which has a lower initial investment. For variant A, where the capacity of the barn is 27,115 animals, it turns out that the required rate of return of 6% can be achieved with just six batches per year (ISD of 6.1%). For variant B, however, 7 batches would be required to achieve a comparable economic result. This would result in an internal rate of return of 6.4%. As expected, both sales prices and costs have a very significant impact on the viability of an investment. At the same rate of change (15%), variant A is less sensitive and would be the one we would propose to implement. .

Keywords:poultry, broilers, barns, investment, economics

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back