The Real Property Mass Valuation Act of 2017 determines the criterion for calibrating valuation models in favour of the method of market comparisons. This criterion represents the mean value of ratios between the general market value, which is determined by valuation models, and the value of market prices, which are appropriately time-adjusted. Within the individual value zones this should be between 0.8 and 1.2. The purpose of this thesis is to analyse these ratios in the Pomurje statistical region, taking into account the general market value (according to the Real Property Mass Valuation Act of 2006) instead of the determined general value. The subject of consideration are sold apartments and residential buildings in the period 31.03.2017 - 31.03.2020.
The first part of the thesis presents the results of the analysis of the residential real estate market in the considered area, as per the annual and half-yearly reports of the state Geodetic Administration of the Republic of Slovenia. These results were used to execute the time adjustment of the contract prices on sold residential properties, obtained from the Cenilec application. In the second part of the thesis, an analysis of the ratios between the general market value and the time-adjusted contract price of residential real estate is made. The results are given separately by value zones and separately for apartments and residential buildings. Results show that general market valuation models better estimate the value of an individual apartment than of a residential building. A relatively large share of inadequately valued individual residential real estates, especially in cases where the general market value is valued higher than the time-adjusted contract price, show that the residential real estate valuation models in these cases are not adequate and do not take into account the fundamental tax principle of fairness. The criterion for calibrating models according to the Real Property Valuation Act of 2017, which refers to the value zone and does not take into account the individual taxpayer, is inadequate and should be changed.
|