izpis_h1_title_alt

Uporaba osebne varovalne opreme pri delu radioloških inženirjev : diplomsko delo
ID Gramc, Patricija (Author), ID Štraus, Nika (Author), ID Mekiš, Nejc (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Dolenc, Laura (Comentor), ID Škrk, Damijan (Reviewer)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,30 MB)
MD5: 8C26A6D42E66A67F90506810EEE43B2C

Abstract
Uvod: Da bi bila doza delavca čim manjša, skušamo to doseči s časom, razdaljo in uporabo zaščitnih sredstev. Osebna varovalna oprema služi atenuaciji ionizirajočega sevanja in s tem varuje delavca pred dodatno dozo sevanja. Namen: Namen diplomskega dela je bil raziskati ali radiološki inženirji med svojim delom uporabljajo svinčeno ali ne svinčeno varovalno opremo, kako z njo ravnajo, ali izvajajo preverjanje kakovosti svinčene zaščitne opreme ter njen potek. Metode dela: Uporabili smo deskriptivno metodo, kjer smo pregledali obstoječo domačo ter tujo strokovno-znanstveno literaturo. Pri kvantitativni metodi zbiranja podatkov smo kot merski inštrument uporabili anketni vprašalnik v katerem smo spraševali o uporabi svinčene in ne svinčene opreme, shranjevanju in čiščenju zaščitne opreme ter o izvajanju preverjanja kakovosti le te. Rezultati: 62 % radioloških inženirjev se pri svojem delu vedno zaščiti z osebno varovalno opremo, najpogosteje pa uporabljajo svinčeno opremo in sicer zaščitne plašče ter zaščito za ščitnico. V primeru, da uporabljajo ne svinčeno zaščitno opremo, so to največkrat zaščitne rokavice. Pribl. polovica meni, da je ne svinčena zaščitna oprema enako učinkovita kot svinčena. Na delovnem mestu imajo skoraj vsi določen prostor za shranjevanje zaščite, najpogosteje so to obešalniki in stojala. 37 % radioloških inženirjev pogosto čisti zaščito, 4 % pa je ne očistijo nikoli. Preverjanje kakovosti izvajajo v 63 %, v večini primerov je zanjo odgovorna zadolžena oseba. Najpogosteje se uporablja metoda rentgenskega slikanja in vizualni pregled, ki se v večini primerov izvaja 1-krat letno. Na delovnem mestu 42 % nima določenega protokola za preverjanje kakovosti, 28 % ga ima, ostali pa z njim niso seznanjeni. Pri večini je ob delu že prišlo do poškodb zaščite opreme, kar so najpogosteje ugotovili z uporabo rentgenskega slikanja ali vizualnim pregledom. Kadar je do poškodbe prišlo se je v 73 % vedno opravila menjava. Radiološki inženirji si pri svojem delu najpogosteje delijo osebno zaščitno opremo s sodelavci. Razprava in zaključek: Večina anketirancev pri svojem delu uporablja svinčeno zaščitno opremo. Uporabniki ne svinčene zaščitne opreme najpogosteje ne vedo iz katerega materiala je sestavljena, menijo pa, da je enako učinkovita kot svinčena. Kakovost največkrat preverjajo z rentgenskim slikanjem in sicer 1-krat letno, kar priporoča tudi literatura. Smiselno bi bilo izvesti raziskavo na večjem vzorcu radioloških inženirjev, kar bi omogočilo boljše posploševanje za večino radioloških inženirjev v Sloveniji.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:radiološki inženirji, osebna varovalna oprema, svinčena zaščitna oprema, ne svinčena zaščitna oprema, preverjanje kakovosti
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[P. Gramc, N. Štraus]
Year:2022
Number of pages:43 str., [9] str. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-140300 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-07
COBISS.SI-ID:121577219 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:14.09.2022
Views:1378
Downloads:156
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The use of personal protective equipment among radiologic technologists : diploma work
Abstract:
Introduction: In order to keep the worker's dose as low as possible, we try to achieve this through time, distance and the use of protective equipment. Personal protective equipment serves to attenuate ionizing radiation and thus protects the worker from an additional dose of radiation. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether radiological engineers use lead or non-lead protection during their work, how they handle it, whether they perform quality control of lead protection and how it is done. Methods: We used a descriptive method, where we reviewed the existing domestic and foreign professional and scientific literature on the topic. In a quantitative method of data collection, we used a survey questionnaire as a measuring instrument in which we asked about the use of lead and non-lead protection, storage and cleaning of protection and quality control of lead protection. Results: The results showed that 62 % radiological engineers always protect themselves in their work with personal protective equipment, but most often they use lead protection, namely protective coats and protection for the thyroid gland. Approximately, half believe that non-lead protection is as effective as lead, and the rest that it is not or they don't know. In the workplace, almost everyone has a certain space for storing protection, most often these are hangers and racks. 37% of radiological engineers often clean personal protective equipment and 4% never clean it. Quality control is performed in 63%, in most cases it is the responsibility of the person in charge. The most commonly used method is X-ray and visual inspection, it is performed in most cases once a year. At work, 42% do not have a specific protocol for quality control, 28% have, and the rest are not aware of it or they don't know. In most cases, injuries have already occurred during radiological engineers work, most commonly identified using X-ray imaging or visual inspection. When an injury occurred, in 73% the change was always made. Most radiological engineers share personal protective equipment with their colleagues. Discussion and conclusion: Most radiological engineers use lead personal protective equipment in their work. Users of non-lead protection most often do not know what material it is made of, but they believe that it is just as effective as lead. Quality control is most often checked by X-ray, once a year, which is also recommended by the literature. It would make sense to conduct research on a larger sample of radiological engineers, which would enable better generalization for most radiological engineers in Slovenia.

Keywords:radiological engineers, personal protective equipment, lead protective equipment, non-lead protective equipment, quality control

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back