Introduction: The rotator cuff muscles with their tendons hold greater responsibility for dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint, therefore a rupture can cause instability and dysfunction. The main goal of the reconstructive procedure is to restore function. Physiotherapy in the post-operative period has a big impact on the success of the repair. There are two main possible exercise approaches, the first one is traditional, with limitation of movement and the second one, which is more aggressive, with early muscle activation. The evidence about effects of early active movement on outcomes in literature differs. Purpose: The purpose of this diploma work is to analyze findings of researches about effects of early active and actively assisted movement on treatment outcomes after reconstruction of a rotator cuff rupture. Methods: We searched databases PubMed, PEDro in CINAHL and included randomized controlled trials published in English in period from year 2000 till including December 2021. Results: Five studies were included. The study designs divided patients into early motion group and in delayed motion group. Measured outcome were pain, level of function, life quality, patients’ satisfaction, active and passive range of motion, muscle strength, re-tear rates and time course of tendon healing. Studies’ findings relating to the different measured outcomes varied at different points in time. The early motion groups presented faster gain in range of motion at the same time results suggesting the possible positive effect of quicker pain relive. Statistically significant difference of number of re-tears in both groups was not found. Discussion and conclusion: Early active movement has positive effects on treatment outcomes after reconstruction of rotator cuff tears, an increased risk for re-tears is not proven. From the found results we can claim that early active motion can contributes to the faster gain of range of motion. Researches are in conflict about short-term and long-term effects on pain, functional activity and muscle strength. The heterogeneity of the research makes it difficult to compare and interpret the results. Based on this systematic review, it is not possible to clearly determine if early active movement is a better approach to use in clinical practice. Further research in this area is needed for more precise conclusions.
|