A large part of society has their last encounter with a formal biological education during high school period, which is why teaching biology is of the extreme importance here. Therefore, we conducted an evaluation of teaching: methods of work, conditions and problems of biology teachers in Slovenian secondary schools. We conducted direct and individual semi-structured interviews with them. The obtained data was qualitatively analyzed by cross-analysis method. We found out that most teachers rate the current Biology Curriculum in high school with a grade of 3 and/or 4, the main criticism being that it is too demanding. When dealing with content sets, teachers follow the order in which they are listed in the curriculum. During the lessons, they most often perform a frontal form of work, using methods such as interpretation, discussion and the use of video materials and/or animations. Among the study materials, they are mostly acquainted with those intended for biology in high school, less with textbooks intended for the study of biology and the least with literature on the didactics of biology. The group form of work (3-4 students per group) predominates in the implementation of laboratory exercises. All teachers involved in the research believe that the inclusion of novelties and current topics in the lessons is very important and they do this very often. It is also extremely important that students form their own points of views. Teachers consider that they are well supported in their work, as well as the possibility and/or desirability of advancement and promotion. Their students usually love biology and 25-30% of them choose to take the biology-matura exam every year. The frequency of activities (in addition to lessons), which include biological content, is assessed with a score of 4. The main problem of teachers is the lack of time to achieve goals, which also hinders their performance. Nevertheless, their motivation to work is very high. The research has shed more light on the teaching of biology, offering opportunities for improvements in biological education.
|