Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
The reliability and medical students’ appreciation of certainty-based marking
ID
Smrkolj, Špela
(
Author
),
ID
Bančov, Enja
(
Author
),
ID
Smrkolj, Vladimir
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(688,86 KB)
MD5: 8598AEE23A24A7C221755C0427811ABC
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1706
Image galllery
Abstract
Certainty-Based Marking (CBM) involves asking students not only the answer to an objective question, but also how certain they are that their answer is correct. In a mixed method design employing an embedded approach with a quasi-experimental design, we have examined the use of CBM during a 5-week Gynaecology and Obstetrics course. The study was conducted as a non-mandatory revision exam with two additional questionnaires on Moodle. Majority of students perceive CBM as fair (78%) and useful (94%). Most students would immediately want CBM to be used for revision exams, but more practice would be needed for CBM to be used in graded exams. The lowest self-evaluation of knowledge was mostly seen by worst (less than 70% Accuracy) and best achievers (more than 90% Accuracy); the worst achievers probably have knowledge gaps, and the best achievers probably correctly guessed at least one question. Our findings conclude that CBM does not discriminate any learner type (p = 0.932) and does not change the general distribution of the exam scores, since there is no significant differences between Certainty-Based Score (M = 80.4%, SD = 10.4%) and Accuracy (M = 79.8%, SD = 11.1%); t(176) = 0.8327, p = 0.4061. These findings are widely applicable, as learner type study models are used extensively in education. In the future, larger samples should be studied and the implementation of CBM on question types other than MCQ should be investigated.
Language:
English
Keywords:
certainty-based marking
,
confidence-based learning
,
undergraduate medical education
,
online exam
,
self-evaluation
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2022
Number of pages:
11 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 19, iss. 3, art. 1706
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-137356
UDC:
61
ISSN on article:
1660-4601
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph19031706
COBISS.SI-ID:
97876483
Publication date in RUL:
14.06.2022
Views:
888
Downloads:
136
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
International journal of environmental research and public health
Shortened title:
Int. j. environ. res. public health
Publisher:
MDPI
ISSN:
1660-4601
COBISS.SI-ID:
1818965
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:
02.02.2022
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
študij medicine
,
medicinsko izobraževanje
,
spletni izpiti
,
samoocenjevanje
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back